Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jan 11:9:4.
doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-9-4.

Neural set point for the control of arterial pressure: role of the nucleus tractus solitarius

Affiliations
Review

Neural set point for the control of arterial pressure: role of the nucleus tractus solitarius

B Silvano Zanutto et al. Biomed Eng Online. .

Abstract

Background: Physiological experiments have shown that the mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) can not be regulated after chemo and cardiopulmonary receptor denervation. Neuro-physiological information suggests that the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) is the only structure that receives information from its rostral neural nuclei and from the cardiovascular receptors and projects to nuclei that regulate the circulatory variables.

Methods: From a control theory perspective, to answer if the cardiovascular regulation has a set point, we should find out whether in the cardiovascular control there is something equivalent to a comparator evaluating the error signal (between the rostral projections to the NTS and the feedback inputs). The NTS would function as a comparator if: a) its lesion suppresses cardiovascular regulation; b) the negative feedback loop still responds normally to perturbations (such as mechanical or electrical) after cutting the rostral afferent fibers to the NTS; c) perturbation of rostral neural structures (RNS) to the NTS modifies the set point without changing the dynamics of the elicited response; and d) cardiovascular responses to perturbations on neural structures within the negative feedback loop compensate for much faster than perturbations on the NTS rostral structures.

Results: From the control theory framework, experimental evidence found currently in the literature plus experimental results from our group was put together showing that the above-mentioned conditions (to show that the NTS functions as a comparator) are satisfied.

Conclusions: Physiological experiments suggest that long-term blood pressure is regulated by the nervous system. The NTS functions as a comparator (evaluating the error signal) between its RNS and the cardiovascular receptor afferents and projects to nuclei that regulate the circulatory variables. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) is regulated by the feedback of chemo and cardiopulmonary receptors and the baroreflex would stabilize the short term pressure value to the prevailing carotid MAP. The discharge rates of rostral neural projections to the NTS would function as the set point of the closed and open loops of cardiovascular control. No doubt, then, the RNS play a functional role not only under steady-state conditions, but also in different behaviors and pathologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental baroreceptor function. Curves in four different conditions where the controlling variable was cardiac frequency increased or decreased by parasympathetic (vagus nerves) discharge, in turn driven from the medulla oblongata outflow. If the horizontal scale is turned over, the sigmoid shape becomes more evident. Triangles on the two left panels mark probable operating points. (Modified after Valentinuzzi, Powell et al, 1972, ref [13], by permission).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Baro-Cardiopulmonary-Chemoreceptors negative feedback loop. Med, medulla oblongata; CIC, CAC, VMC, cardioinhibitory, cardioaccelerator and vasomotor centers, respectively; Comp, comparator; neural reference R; error signal E after the difference against the outflow from the baro, cardiopulmonary and chemoreceptors (Ba, Ca ChR), respectively. BP, blood pressure = PRxCO; Mult, multipliers; PR, peripheral resistance; CO, cardiac output = HRxSV; HR, heart rate; SV, stroke volume. P, pacemaker; CE, myocardial contractile fibers; Trans, postulated transducers from neural section to CV side. (Modified after Valentinuzzi, Powell et al, 1972, ref [13], by permission).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cardiovascular System Nervous Control. The NTS receives afferents from its rostral nervous structures and sends afferents to pre-sympathetic and pre-parasympathetic neurons (See list of abbreviations).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guyton AC. Blood Pressure Control: Special role of the kidneys and body fluids. Science. 1991;252:1813–1816. doi: 10.1126/science.2063193. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Drayer JI, Weber MA, Nakamura DK. Automated ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: A study in age-matched normotensive and hypertensive men. Am Heart J. 1985;109:1334–38. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90361-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weber MA. Whole-day blood pressure [clinical conference] Hypertension. 1988;11:288–298. - PubMed
    1. Hilton SM. Inhibition of baroreceptor reflexes on hypothalamic stimulation. J Physiology. 1963;165:56–57.
    1. Spyer KM. In: Autonomic Failure. Bannister R, Mathias C, editor. Oxford-New York-Tokyo: Oxford University Press; 1992. Central nervous control of the cardiovascular system; pp. 54–77.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources