Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;118(3):394-9.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.0900781. Epub 2009 Oct 23.

Microwaves from Mobile Phones Inhibit 53BP1 Focus Formation in Human Stem Cells More Strongly Than in Differentiated Cells: Possible Mechanistic Link to Cancer Risk

Affiliations

Microwaves from Mobile Phones Inhibit 53BP1 Focus Formation in Human Stem Cells More Strongly Than in Differentiated Cells: Possible Mechanistic Link to Cancer Risk

Eva Markovà et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Background: It is widely accepted that DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and their misrepair in stem cells are critical events in the multistage origination of various leukemias and tumors, including gliomas.

Objectives: We studied whether microwaves from mobile telephones of the Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) and the Universal Global Telecommunications System (UMTS) induce DSBs or affect DSB repair in stem cells.

Methods: We analyzed tumor suppressor TP53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) foci that are typically formed at the sites of DSB location (referred to as DNA repair foci) by laser confocal microscopy.

Results: Microwaves from mobile phones inhibited formation of 53BP1 foci in human primary fibroblasts and mesenchymal stem cells. These data parallel our previous findings for human lymphocytes. Importantly, the same GSM carrier frequency (915 MHz) and UMTS frequency band (1947.4 MHz) were effective for all cell types. Exposure at 905 MHz did not inhibit 53BP1 foci in differentiated cells, either fibroblasts or lymphocytes, whereas some effects were seen in stem cells at 905 MHz. Contrary to fibroblasts, stem cells did not adapt to chronic exposure during 2 weeks.

Conclusions: The strongest microwave effects were always observed in stem cells. This result may suggest both significant misbalance in DSB repair and severe stress response. Our findings that stem cells are most sensitive to microwave exposure and react to more frequencies than do differentiated cells may be important for cancer risk assessment and indicate that stem cells are the most relevant cellular model for validating safe mobile communication signals.

Keywords: 53BP1 foci; DNA double-strand breaks; microwaves; mobile phones; stem cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
53BP1 foci in VH-10 fibroblasts after 1-, 2-, or 3-hr exposure to GSM MWs at 905 or 915 MHz, UMTS MWs at 1947.4 MHz, or heat shock at 41°C, as determined by immunostaining and confocal laser microscopy. Values shown are mean ± SD of cells from three to five experiments.
Figure 2
Figure 2
53BP1 foci in human MSCs after 1-, 2-, or 3-hr exposure to GSM MW at 905 or 915 MHz, UMTS MW at 1947.4 MHz, or heat shock at 41°C. Values shown are mean ± SD from three to five experiments.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of 53BP1 foci among MSCs exposed to GSM (A) or UMTS (B) MWs. Distribution of cells according to number of foci per cell is shown as normalized frequency of cells versus the number of foci per cell. Heat shock (41°C) served as the positive control for MW exposure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
53BP1 foci in VH-10 fibroblasts and MSCs after chronic exposure during 10 days (5 days/week, 1 hr/day) to GSM MW at 905 MHz or 915 MHz, and UMTS MW at 1947.4 MHz. Values shown are mean ± SD from three experiments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams MM, Carpenter PB. Tying the loose ends together in DNA double strand break repair with 53BP1. Cell Div. 2006;1:19. doi: 10.1186/1747-1028-1-19. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adey WR. Tissue interactions with nonionizing electromagnetic fields. Physiol Rev. 1981;61(2):435–514. - PubMed
    1. Altaner C. Glioblastoma and stem cells. Neoplasma. 2008;55(5):369–374. - PubMed
    1. Banath JP, Banuelos CA, Klokov D, MacPhail SM, Lansdorp PM, Olive PL. Explanation for excessive DNA single-strand breaks and endogenous repair foci in pluripotent mouse embryonic stem cells. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315(8):1505–1520. - PubMed
    1. Banath JP, Macphail SH, Olive PL. Radiation sensitivity, H2AX phosphorylation, and kinetics of repair of DNA strand breaks in irradiated cervical cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 2004;64(19):7144–7149. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances