Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):13-8.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3295.

Improving newborn screening laboratory test ordering and result reporting using health information exchange

Affiliations

Improving newborn screening laboratory test ordering and result reporting using health information exchange

Stephen M Downs et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Capture, coding and communication of newborn screening (NBS) information represent a challenge for public health laboratories, health departments, hospitals, and ambulatory care practices. An increasing number of conditions targeted for screening and the complexity of interpretation contribute to a growing need for integrated information-management strategies. This makes NBS an important test of tools and architecture for electronic health information exchange (HIE) in this convergence of individual patient care and population health activities. For this reason, the American Health Information Community undertook three tasks described in this paper. First, a newborn screening use case was established to facilitate standards harmonization for common terminology and interoperability specifications guiding HIE. Second, newborn screening coding and terminology were developed for integration into electronic HIE activities. Finally, clarification of privacy, security, and clinical laboratory regulatory requirements governing information exchange was provided, serving as a framework to establish pathways for improving screening program timeliness, effectiveness, and efficiency of quality patient care services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Carroll AE, Downs SM. Comprehensive cost–utility analysis of newborn screening strategies. Pediatrics 2006;117:S287–95 - PubMed
    1. Johnson K, Lloyd-Puryear MA, Mann MY, et al. Financing state newborn screening programs: sources and use of funds. Pediatrics 2006;177:S270–9 - PubMed
    1. US General Accounting Office Newborn screening: characteristics of state programs. Washington: US Government Printing Office, 2003. Publication GAO-03-449. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03449.pdf (accessed 30 Jan 2009).
    1. Clemens CJ, Davis SA, Bailey AR, et al. The false-positive in universal newborn screening. Pediatrics 2000;106:E7. - PubMed
    1. Clemens CJ, Davis SA. Minimizing false-positives in universal newborn hearing screening: a simple solution. Pediatrics 2001;107:E29. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms