Rating scales for low back pain
- PMID: 20064820
- DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldp052
Rating scales for low back pain
Abstract
Introduction: During the past decades several rating scales have been developed to assess the functional status of patients with low back pain.
Methods: We performed a search using the keywords 'spine' in combination with 'scoring system', 'scale', 'scores', 'outcome assessment', 'low back pain' and 'clinical evaluation'.
Results: Twenty-eight scoring systems are currently available for the evaluation of low back pain. Each of them evaluates low back pain using specific variables. All these scoring systems are presented.
Discussion: Although many scoring systems have been used to evaluate the back function, we are still far from a single outcome evaluation system that is reliable, valid and sensitive to clinically relevant changes, taken into account both patients' and physicians' perspective and is short and practical to use.
Conclusion: Further studies are required to evaluate the reliability, validity and sensitivity of the low back pain scoring systems used in the common clinical practice.
Similar articles
-
Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow.Br Med Bull. 2008;87:131-61. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldn023. Epub 2008 Jun 6. Br Med Bull. 2008. PMID: 18539627 Review.
-
Validity of the new Backache Index (BAI) in patients with low back pain.Spine J. 2006 Sep-Oct;6(5):565-71. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.01.021. Spine J. 2006. PMID: 16934729 Clinical Trial.
-
Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Mar 15;28(6):607-15. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000050654.97387.DF. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003. PMID: 12642770
-
Measuring self-reported functional status and pain in patients with chronic low back pain by postal questionnaires: a reliability study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Apr 15;28(8):828-33. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003. PMID: 12698128
-
Clinically important outcomes in low back pain.Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005 Aug;19(4):593-607. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.003. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005. PMID: 15949778 Review.
Cited by
-
A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain.Acta Orthop. 2015;86(5):523-33. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1036696. Acta Orthop. 2015. PMID: 25828191 Free PMC article.
-
Articular arthrodesis with the facet wedge technique for the treatment of unstable lumbar degenerative disease and associated conditions: A retrospective study of 96 patients.World Neurosurg X. 2024 Feb 24;22:100351. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100351. eCollection 2024 Apr. World Neurosurg X. 2024. PMID: 38469389 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: Results of first 100 cases.Indian J Orthop. 2017 Jan-Feb;51(1):36-42. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.197520. Indian J Orthop. 2017. PMID: 28216749 Free PMC article.
-
Instruments to assess patients with rotator cuff pathology: a systematic review of measurement properties.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Oct;20(10):1961-70. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1827-z. Epub 2011 Dec 20. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012. PMID: 22183737
-
Self-rated measure of pain frequency, intensity, and burden: psychometric properties of a new instrument for the assessment of pain.J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Dec;59:155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 27. J Psychiatr Res. 2014. PMID: 25194231 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous