Task-dependent individual differences in prefrontal connectivity
- PMID: 20064942
- PMCID: PMC2923215
- DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp284
Task-dependent individual differences in prefrontal connectivity
Abstract
Recent advances in neuroimaging have permitted testing of hypotheses regarding the neural bases of individual differences, but this burgeoning literature has been characterized by inconsistent results. To test the hypothesis that differences in task demands could contribute to between-study variability in brain-behavior relationships, we had participants perform 2 tasks that varied in the extent of cognitive involvement. We examined connectivity between brain regions during a low-demand vigilance task and a higher-demand digit-symbol visual search task using Granger causality analysis (GCA). Our results showed 1) Significant differences in numbers of frontoparietal connections between low- and high-demand tasks 2) that GCA can detect activity changes that correspond with task-demand changes, and 3) faster participants showed more vigilance-related activity than slower participants, but less visual-search activity. These results suggest that relatively low-demand cognitive performance depends on spontaneous bidirectionally fluctuating network activity, whereas high-demand performance depends on a limited, unidirectional network. The nature of brain-behavior relationships may vary depending on the extent of cognitive demand. High-demand network activity may reflect the extent to which individuals require top-down executive guidance of behavior for successful task performance. Low-demand network activity may reflect task- and performance monitoring that minimizes executive requirements for guidance of behavior.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Visual target modulation of functional connectivity networks revealed by self-organizing group ICA.Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Dec;29(12):1450-61. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20479. Hum Brain Mapp. 2008. PMID: 17990304 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the unity and diversity of the neural substrates of executive functioning.Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Aug;25(4):409-23. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20118. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005. PMID: 15852470 Free PMC article.
-
Functional connectivity of default mode network components: correlation, anticorrelation, and causality.Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Feb;30(2):625-37. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20531. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009. PMID: 18219617 Free PMC article.
-
From humble neural beginnings comes knowledge of numbers.Neuron. 2003 Jan 9;37(1):4-6. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01179-0. Neuron. 2003. PMID: 12526766 Review.
-
Brain connectivity and visual attention.Brain Connect. 2013;3(4):317-38. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0139. Epub 2013 Jun 8. Brain Connect. 2013. PMID: 23597177 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Is Granger causality a viable technique for analyzing fMRI data?PLoS One. 2013 Jul 4;8(7):e67428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067428. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23861763 Free PMC article.
-
Functional ultrasound imaging of intrinsic connectivity in the living rat brain with high spatiotemporal resolution.Nat Commun. 2014 Oct 3;5:5023. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6023. Nat Commun. 2014. PMID: 25277668 Free PMC article.
-
Effective Connectivity within the Default Mode Network: Dynamic Causal Modeling of Resting-State fMRI Data.Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Feb 1;10:14. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00014. eCollection 2016. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 26869900 Free PMC article.
-
Neural primacy of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102432. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102432. Epub 2020 Sep 11. Neuroimage Clin. 2020. PMID: 32987298 Free PMC article.
-
Alterations in hippocampal connectivity across the psychosis dimension.Psychiatry Res. 2015 Aug 30;233(2):148-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 16. Psychiatry Res. 2015. PMID: 26123450 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Allen G, McColl R, Barnard H, Ringe WK, Fleckenstein J, Cullum CM. Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebellar-prefrontal and cerebellar-parietal functional connectivity. Neuroimage. 2005;28:39–48. - PubMed
-
- Babiloni C, Del Percio C, Rossini PM, Marzano N, Iacoboni M, Infarinato F, Lizio R, Piazza M, Pirritano M, Berlutti G, et al. Judgment of actions in experts: a high-resolution EEG study in elite athletes. Neuroimage. 2009;45:512–521. - PubMed
-
- Baddeley AD. Working Memory. NY: Oxford University Press; 1986.
-
- Beck A, Steer R. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio (TX): Psychological Corporation. 1987
-
- Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat. 2001;29:1165–1188.