Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care
- PMID: 20066693
- PMCID: PMC2819541
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24761
Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care
Abstract
Background: Guidelines recommend advanced care planning for terminally ill patients with <1 year to live. Few data are available regarding when physicians and their terminally ill patients typically discuss end-of-life issues.
Methods: A national survey was conducted of physicians caring for cancer patients about timing of discussions regarding prognosis, do not resuscitate (DNR) status, hospice, and preferred site of death with their terminally ill patients. Logistic regression was used to identify physician and practice characteristics associated with earlier discussions.
Results: Among 4074 respondents, 65% would discuss prognosis "now" (defined as patient has 4 months to 6 months to live, asymptomatic). Fewer would discuss DNR status (44%), hospice (26%), or preferred site of death (21%) immediately, with most physicians waiting for patient symptoms or until there are no more treatments to offer. In multivariate analyses, younger physicians more often discussed prognosis, DNR status, hospice, and site of death "now" (all P < .05). Surgeons and oncologists were more likely than noncancer specialists to discuss prognosis "now" (P = .008), but noncancer specialists were more likely than cancer specialists to discuss DNR status, hospice, and preferred site of death "now" (all P < .001).
Conclusions: Most physicians report they would not discuss end-of-life options with terminally ill patients who are feeling well, instead waiting for symptoms or until there are no more treatments to offer. More research is needed to understand physicians' reasons for timing of discussions and how their propensity to aggressively treat metastatic disease influences timing, as well as how the timing of discussions influences patient and family experiences at the end of life.
Figures
Comment in
-
Physicians and end-of-life issues.Cancer. 2010 Aug 15;116(16):3978; author reply 3978-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25411. Cancer. 2010. PMID: 20564166 No abstract available.
References
-
- Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Goodman DC, Skinner JS. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care 2008. Lebanon, NH: The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; 2008. [accessed April 13, 2008]. Tracking the care of patients with severe chronic illness. http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/atlases/2008_Chronic_Care_Atlas.pdf. - PubMed
-
- Foley KM, Gelband H, editors. Institute of Medicine. Improving palliative care for cancer. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2001.
-
- Earle CC, Neville BA, Landrum MB, Ayanian JZ, Block SD, Weeks JC. Trends in the aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:315–21. - PubMed
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Practice Guidelines in Oncology - v.2.2005. Palliative Care; [Accessed May 14, 2007]. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/palliative.pdf. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
