Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb 15;116(4):998-1006.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.24761.

Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care

Affiliations

Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care

Nancy L Keating et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend advanced care planning for terminally ill patients with <1 year to live. Few data are available regarding when physicians and their terminally ill patients typically discuss end-of-life issues.

Methods: A national survey was conducted of physicians caring for cancer patients about timing of discussions regarding prognosis, do not resuscitate (DNR) status, hospice, and preferred site of death with their terminally ill patients. Logistic regression was used to identify physician and practice characteristics associated with earlier discussions.

Results: Among 4074 respondents, 65% would discuss prognosis "now" (defined as patient has 4 months to 6 months to live, asymptomatic). Fewer would discuss DNR status (44%), hospice (26%), or preferred site of death (21%) immediately, with most physicians waiting for patient symptoms or until there are no more treatments to offer. In multivariate analyses, younger physicians more often discussed prognosis, DNR status, hospice, and site of death "now" (all P < .05). Surgeons and oncologists were more likely than noncancer specialists to discuss prognosis "now" (P = .008), but noncancer specialists were more likely than cancer specialists to discuss DNR status, hospice, and preferred site of death "now" (all P < .001).

Conclusions: Most physicians report they would not discuss end-of-life options with terminally ill patients who are feeling well, instead waiting for symptoms or until there are no more treatments to offer. More research is needed to understand physicians' reasons for timing of discussions and how their propensity to aggressively treat metastatic disease influences timing, as well as how the timing of discussions influences patient and family experiences at the end of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure. Timing of discussions about prognosis, DNR status, hospice enrollment, and preferred site of death with terminally ill patients, by physician specialty
The panels present physicians’ reports of when they would discuss prognosis, DNR status, hospice enrollment, and preferred site of death with a patient who is newly diagnosed with metastatic cancer whom they believe has 4–6 months to live. Dark blue reflects the proportion responding “now”, purple reflects “when the patient first develops symptoms”, red reflects “when there are no more non-palliative treatment options”, yellow reflects “only if the patient is hospitalized”, and light blue reflects “only if the patient and/or family brings it up.”

Comment in

  • Physicians and end-of-life issues.
    Gozzetti A. Gozzetti A. Cancer. 2010 Aug 15;116(16):3978; author reply 3978-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25411. Cancer. 2010. PMID: 20564166 No abstract available.

References

    1. Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Goodman DC, Skinner JS. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care 2008. Lebanon, NH: The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; 2008. [accessed April 13, 2008]. Tracking the care of patients with severe chronic illness. http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/atlases/2008_Chronic_Care_Atlas.pdf. - PubMed
    1. Foley KM, Gelband H, editors. Institute of Medicine. Improving palliative care for cancer. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2001.
    1. Earle CC, Neville BA, Landrum MB, Ayanian JZ, Block SD, Weeks JC. Trends in the aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:315–21. - PubMed
    1. Barnato AE, Herndon MB, Anthony DL, et al. Are regional variations in end-of-life care intensity explained by patient preferences?: A Study of the US Medicare Population. Med Care. 2007;45:386–93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Practice Guidelines in Oncology - v.2.2005. Palliative Care; [Accessed May 14, 2007]. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/palliative.pdf. - PubMed

Publication types