Safety and efficacy of desloratadine in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis or chronic urticaria: results of four postmarketing surveillance studies
- PMID: 20067329
- DOI: 10.2165/11530930-000000000-00000
Safety and efficacy of desloratadine in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis or chronic urticaria: results of four postmarketing surveillance studies
Abstract
Background and objective: Allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic urticaria (CU) are common diseases with symptoms that impair quality of life. Second-generation antihistamines (e.g. cetirizine, desloratadine, fexofenadine, loratadine and mizolastine) are recommended first-line treatment for both conditions; however, studies of clinically relevant differences among these agents are lacking. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of desloratadine 5 mg once daily in four postmarketing surveillance studies in subjects with seasonal AR (SAR) or chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) in real-world clinical practice settings.
Methods: This programme of prospective surveillance studies was conducted in Germany between February 2001 and March 2002 in allergy; dermatology; ear, nose and throat; or general practice settings. Subjects (total number 77 880) were aged > or =12 years and met the requirements for treatment of SAR or CIU with desloratadine as outlined in the package insert. All subjects received oral desloratadine 5 mg once daily for a mean duration of up to 40.4 days. Adverse events (AEs) were reported throughout the studies; serious AEs were recorded for up to 30 days after treatment. Investigators and subjects both rated tolerability at the end of treatment. Symptom severity and sleep and daily activity impairment were evaluated at baseline and after treatment using 4-point scales (0 = none; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). A post hoc subanalysis assessed desloratadine efficacy and onset of symptom relief in subjects who had received monotherapy with another second-generation antihistamine.
Results: A total of 386 AEs were reported by 287 subjects (0.37%) in the four studies. The most commonly reported treatment-related AEs were fatigue (0.07%), headache (0.07%), dry mouth (0.04%) and nausea (0.03%). Tolerability was rated as excellent/good by 99.1% of investigators and 98.5% of subjects. Desloratadine therapy significantly reduced nasal and ocular symptom severity, itching and wheals, and sleep and activity disruption (p < 0.0001), as indicated by a reduction in mean total and individual symptom scores, and reported impairment of sleep and daily activities. The efficacy of desloratadine was rated as significantly greater by 59.4-88.0% of subjects who had previously received monotherapy with cetirizine, fexofenadine, loratadine or mizolastine (p < 0.01 for all). The percentage of subjects who rated onset of symptom relief with desloratadine as faster than previous treatment ranged from 51.6% to 82.4%.
Conclusion: Desloratadine was safe, well tolerated and efficacious in this series of surveillance studies. A post hoc analysis of subjects who had received previous monotherapy with a second-generation antihistamine found that most subjects rated efficacy as higher than their previous treatment, with a faster onset of symptom relief.
Similar articles
-
Safety and efficacy of desloratadine in chronic idiopathic urticaria in clinical practice: an observational study of 9246 patients.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009 Mar;23(3):292-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.03034.x. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009. PMID: 19438819
-
Levocetirizine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria in adults and children.Clin Ther. 2009 Aug;31(8):1664-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.015. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19808127 Review.
-
A review of the efficacy of desloratadine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine in the treatment of nasal congestion in patients with allergic rhinitis.Clin Ther. 2009 May;31(5):921-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.05.017. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19539095 Review.
-
The safety and efficacy of desloratadine for the management of allergic disease.Drug Saf. 2005;28(12):1101-18. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528120-00005. Drug Saf. 2005. PMID: 16329713 Review.
-
Desloratadine for chronic idiopathic urticaria: a review of clinical efficacy.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2007;8(5):271-83. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200708050-00002. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2007. PMID: 17902729 Review.
Cited by
-
The role and choice criteria of antihistamines in allergy management - expert opinion.Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2016 Dec;33(6):397-410. doi: 10.5114/pdia.2016.63942. Epub 2016 Dec 2. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2016. PMID: 28035215 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of efficacy and impact on work productivity and attendance after a mandatory switch to generic second-generation antihistamines: results of a patient survey in Norway.Clin Mol Allergy. 2011 Feb 28;9:5. doi: 10.1186/1476-7961-9-5. Clin Mol Allergy. 2011. PMID: 21356091 Free PMC article.
-
Brain histamine H1 receptor occupancy after oral administration of desloratadine and loratadine.Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2019 Jul 12;7(4):e00499. doi: 10.1002/prp2.499. eCollection 2019 Aug. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2019. PMID: 31338198 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The novel TFEB agonist desloratadine ameliorates hepatic steatosis by activating the autophagy-lysosome pathway.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 18;15:1449178. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1449178. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 39359254 Free PMC article.
-
Expanding the Diversity of Plant Monoterpenoid Indole Alkaloids Employing Human Cytochrome P450 3A4.Chembiochem. 2020 Jul 16;21(14):1976-1980. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202000020. Epub 2020 Apr 6. Chembiochem. 2020. PMID: 32181956 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous