[Tobacco control politics in Germany. Evidence, success, and barriers]
- PMID: 20069264
- DOI: 10.1007/s00103-009-1015-1
[Tobacco control politics in Germany. Evidence, success, and barriers]
Abstract
Structural measures of tobacco prevention are effective and cost-efficient measures to reduce tobacco consumption and the related health and economic consequences. However, Germany has been very reluctant in implementing tobacco control laws for several decades. Only recently has Germany increased its efforts in tobacco control, which has resulted in a decrease of tobacco consumption and in a decrease of smoking rates, especially in youths. This paper summarizes the evidence-based measures of tobacco prevention as well as the progress of recent German tobacco control policies. Finally, the barriers of further effective tobacco control policies are discussed and illustrated with examples. For decades, politics gave in to pressure and influence of lobbyists of the strong tobacco industry, which deceived the public and politics for their economic interests and in order to establish a high social acceptance of smoking. In addition, there is the phenomenon of "denialism", which means the convinced denial of scientific findings regarding smoking and smoking prevention in opponents of tobacco control, who are not directly affiliated with the tobacco industry.
Comment in
-
[Critics are not "deniers". Comments on the article by U. Mons and M. Pötschke-Langer in the February/March 2010 issue].Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2011 Apr;54(4):505-6. doi: 10.1007/s00103-011-1254-9. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2011. PMID: 21465408 German. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Between anti-smoking policies and tobacco farming subsidies--the case of Macedonia.Eur J Public Health. 2013 Jun;23(3):354-5. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks178. Epub 2012 Dec 28. Eur J Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23275476 No abstract available.
-
[Critics are not "deniers". Comments on the article by U. Mons and M. Pötschke-Langer in the February/March 2010 issue].Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2011 Apr;54(4):505-6. doi: 10.1007/s00103-011-1254-9. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2011. PMID: 21465408 German. No abstract available.
-
[Health promotion-related duties and rules--the acceptance of governmental authorities in the private sphere of health].Gesundheitswesen. 2010 Jan;72(1):3-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1237736. Epub 2010 Jan 26. Gesundheitswesen. 2010. PMID: 20104434 German.
-
Government action to reduce smoking.Respirology. 2003 Mar;8(1):7-16. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00436.x. Respirology. 2003. PMID: 12856736 Review.
-
Smokeless tobacco: the epidemiology and politics of harm.Biomarkers. 2009 Jul;14 Suppl 1:79-84. doi: 10.1080/13547500902965476. Biomarkers. 2009. PMID: 19604065 Review.
Cited by
-
Human Dignity as Leading Principle in Public Health Ethics: A Multi-Case Analysis of 21st Century German Health Policy Decisions.Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Mar 1;7(3):210-224. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.67. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018. PMID: 29524950 Free PMC article.
-
The German East-West Mortality Difference: Two Crossovers Driven by Smoking.Demography. 2017 Jun;54(3):1051-1071. doi: 10.1007/s13524-017-0577-z. Demography. 2017. PMID: 28493101 Free PMC article.
-
The underwhelming German life expectancy.Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Aug;38(8):839-850. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-00995-5. Epub 2023 Apr 25. Eur J Epidemiol. 2023. PMID: 37185793 Free PMC article.
-
Smoking prevalence in the area of responsibility of the German Ministry of Defense - results of the employee survey in the context of occupational health management.Mil Med Res. 2020 Feb 21;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40779-020-00236-w. Mil Med Res. 2020. PMID: 32079544 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical