Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2010 Jul;20(7):1715-25.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1700-3. Epub 2010 Jan 13.

Incidental focal solid liver lesions: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MR imaging

Affiliations
Free article
Clinical Trial

Incidental focal solid liver lesions: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MR imaging

Michael Soussan et al. Eur Radiol. 2010 Jul.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and MR imaging in incidental solid focal liver lesions not characterised on ultrasound.

Materials and methods: Forty-seven patients with 50 lesions underwent MR imaging and CEUS: 24 focal nodular hyperplasias (FNH), 11 adenomas, 10 haemangiomas, 1 focal fatty change and 4 malignant lesions were identified. Two experienced radiologists randomly reviewed contrast-enhanced MR imaging and CEUS data, and provided the most likely diagnosis. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), likelihood ratios (LR) and kappa value were calculated.

Results: A histotype diagnosis was obtained in 66-52% with MR imaging and 52-53% with CEUS, respectively, for both readers. Se, Sp and LR for haemangioma were 100-100, 100-100 and 78-78 with MR imaging and 89-89, 100-100 and 68-70 with CEUS; for FNH with MR imaging they were 88-63, 96-100 and 23-34 and 74-67, 88-96 and 6-17 with CEUS. If the diagnosis of haemangioma was uncertain with CEUS, MR imaging always confirmed the diagnosis. If the diagnosis of FNH was uncertain with either CEUS or MR imaging, the other imaging technique confirmed the diagnosis in approximately half the cases.

Conclusion: Both CEUS and MR imaging have a high diagnostic performance in incidental focal liver lesions and are complementary when diagnosis is uncertain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Dec;165(6):1407-13 - PubMed
    1. HPB (Oxford). 2007;9(3):208-15 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Radiol. 2006 May;58(2):236-45 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2007 Jan;242(1):162-74 - PubMed
    1. Radiol Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;108(1-2):71-81 - PubMed