This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 2010 Feb;35(2):250-1; author reply 251, 251-2.

doi: 10.1002/uog.7539.

Assessment of Cesarean section scars with transvaginal sonography

PMID: 20069682
DOI: 10.1002/uog.7539

Free article

Comment

Assessment of Cesarean section scars with transvaginal sonography

H F Yazicioglu. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb.

Free article

. 2010 Feb;35(2):250-1; author reply 251, 251-2.

doi: 10.1002/uog.7539.

Author

PMID: 20069682
DOI: 10.1002/uog.7539

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination.
Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. Osser OV, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;34(1):90-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.6395. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19499514
Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position.
Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. Wang CB, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;34(1):85-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.6405. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19565535

Similar articles

High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination.
Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. Osser OV, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;34(1):90-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.6395. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19499514
Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors.
Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E, Yazbek J, Lee C, Gonzalez J, Jurkovic D. Ofili-Yebovi D, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;31(1):72-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.5200. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18061960
[Evaluation of the condition of the uterine scar after cesarean section by echography].
Titchenko LI, Belousov MA, Zhilenko MI. Titchenko LI, et al. Akush Ginekol (Mosk). 1990 Nov;(11):69-70. Akush Ginekol (Mosk). 1990. PMID: 2077921 Russian. No abstract available.
Standardized approach for imaging and measuring Cesarean section scars using ultrasonography.
Naji O, Abdallah Y, Bij De Vaate AJ, Smith A, Pexsters A, Stalder C, McIndoe A, Ghaem-Maghami S, Lees C, Brölmann HA, Huirne JA, Timmerman D, Bourne T. Naji O, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;39(3):252-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.10077. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 21858885 Review.
[Multiple cesarean section].
Waidl E. Waidl E. Med Klin. 1966 Jun 17;61(24):941-5. Med Klin. 1966. PMID: 4869027 Review. German. No abstract available.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Association of Menstrual Extension and Surgery Effectiveness with Ultrasound Parameters of Cesarean Section Scar Diverticulum in Patients Undergoing Transvaginal Uterine Diverticulum Repair.
Yang Q, Ren M, Lv X, Chen F. Yang Q, et al. Mediators Inflamm. 2019 Dec 19;2019:7415891. doi: 10.1155/2019/7415891. eCollection 2019. Mediators Inflamm. 2019. PMID: 31933542 Free PMC article.

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
- Wiley
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information