Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;23(1):149-56.
doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01884.x.

Evolution of monogamous marriage by maximization of inclusive fitness

Affiliations
Free article

Evolution of monogamous marriage by maximization of inclusive fitness

L Fortunato et al. J Evol Biol. 2010 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

The majority of human societies allow polygynous marriage, and the prevalence of this practice is readily understood in evolutionary terms. Why some societies prescribe monogamous marriage is however not clear: current evolutionary explanations--that social monogamy increases within-group co-operation, giving societies an advantage in competition with other groups--conflict with the historical and ethnographic evidence. We show that, within the framework of inclusive fitness theory, monogamous marriage can be viewed as the outcome of the strategic behaviour of males and females in the allocation of resources to the next generation. Where resources are transferred across generations, social monogamy can be advantageous if partitioning of resources among the offspring of multiple wives causes a depletion of their fitness value, and/or if females grant husbands higher fidelity in exchange for exclusive investment of resources in their offspring. This may explain why monogamous marriage prevailed among the historical societies of Eurasia: here, intensive agriculture led to scarcity of land, with depletion in the value of estates through partitioning among multiple heirs. Norms promoting high paternity were common among ancient societies in the region, and may have further facilitated the establishment of social monogamy. In line with the historical and ethnographic evidence, this suggests that monogamous marriage emerged in Eurasia following the adoption of intensive agriculture, as ownership of land became critical to productive and reproductive success.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Integrating economic and evolutionary approaches to polygynous marriage.
    Anderson S, Bidner C. Anderson S, et al. Evol Hum Sci. 2022 Oct 26;4:e52. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2022.49. eCollection 2022. Evol Hum Sci. 2022. PMID: 37588891 Free PMC article. Review.
  • No evidence that polygynous marriage is a harmful cultural practice in northern Tanzania.
    Lawson DW, James S, Ngadaya E, Ngowi B, Mfinanga SG, Borgerhoff Mulder M. Lawson DW, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 10;112(45):13827-32. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507151112. Epub 2015 Oct 26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015. PMID: 26504213 Free PMC article.
  • The expendable male hypothesis.
    Mattison SM, Quinlan RJ, Hare D. Mattison SM, et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Sep 2;374(1780):20180080. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0080. Epub 2019 Jul 15. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31303164 Free PMC article.
  • Reproductive inequality in humans and other mammals.
    Ross CT, Hooper PL, Smith JE, Jaeggi AV, Smith EA, Gavrilets S, Zohora FT, Ziker J, Xygalatas D, Wroblewski EE, Wood B, Winterhalder B, Willführ KP, Willard AK, Walker K, von Rueden C, Voland E, Valeggia C, Vaitla B, Urlacher S, Towner M, Sum CY, Sugiyama LS, Strier KB, Starkweather K, Major-Smith D, Shenk M, Sear R, Seabright E, Schacht R, Scelza B, Scaggs S, Salerno J, Revilla-Minaya C, Redhead D, Pusey A, Purzycki BG, Power EA, Pisor A, Pettay J, Perry S, Page AE, Pacheco-Cobos L, Oths K, Oh SY, Nolin D, Nettle D, Moya C, Migliano AB, Mertens KJ, McNamara RA, McElreath R, Mattison S, Massengill E, Marlowe F, Madimenos F, Macfarlan S, Lummaa V, Lizarralde R, Liu R, Liebert MA, Lew-Levy S, Leslie P, Lanning J, Kramer K, Koster J, Kaplan HS, Jamsranjav B, Hurtado AM, Hill K, Hewlett B, Helle S, Headland T, Headland J, Gurven M, Grimalda G, Greaves R, Golden CD, Godoy I, Gibson M, Mouden CE, Dyble M, Draper P, Downey S, DeMarco AL, Davis HE, Crabtree S, Cortez C, Colleran H, Cohen E, Clark G, Clark J, Caudell MA, Carminito CE, Bunce J, Boyette A, Bowles S, Blumenfield T, Beheim B, Beckerman S, Atkinson Q, Apicella C, Alam N, Mulder MB. Ross CT, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 30;120(22):e2220124120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220124120. Epub 2023 May 22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023. PMID: 37216525 Free PMC article.
  • Half a century of quantitative cultural evolution.
    Fogarty L, Kandler A, Creanza N, Feldman MW. Fogarty L, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Nov 26;121(48):e2418106121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2418106121. Epub 2024 Nov 18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024. PMID: 39556730 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Publication types