Evolution of monogamous marriage by maximization of inclusive fitness
- PMID: 20069721
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01884.x
Evolution of monogamous marriage by maximization of inclusive fitness
Abstract
The majority of human societies allow polygynous marriage, and the prevalence of this practice is readily understood in evolutionary terms. Why some societies prescribe monogamous marriage is however not clear: current evolutionary explanations--that social monogamy increases within-group co-operation, giving societies an advantage in competition with other groups--conflict with the historical and ethnographic evidence. We show that, within the framework of inclusive fitness theory, monogamous marriage can be viewed as the outcome of the strategic behaviour of males and females in the allocation of resources to the next generation. Where resources are transferred across generations, social monogamy can be advantageous if partitioning of resources among the offspring of multiple wives causes a depletion of their fitness value, and/or if females grant husbands higher fidelity in exchange for exclusive investment of resources in their offspring. This may explain why monogamous marriage prevailed among the historical societies of Eurasia: here, intensive agriculture led to scarcity of land, with depletion in the value of estates through partitioning among multiple heirs. Norms promoting high paternity were common among ancient societies in the region, and may have further facilitated the establishment of social monogamy. In line with the historical and ethnographic evidence, this suggests that monogamous marriage emerged in Eurasia following the adoption of intensive agriculture, as ownership of land became critical to productive and reproductive success.
Similar articles
-
Evolution of polygamous marriage by maximization of inclusive fitness.J Theor Biol. 2013 Feb 21;319:134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.11.017. Epub 2012 Nov 27. J Theor Biol. 2013. PMID: 23195920
-
The puzzle of monogamous marriage.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 5;367(1589):657-69. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0290. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012. PMID: 22271782 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The evolution of matrilineal kinship organization.Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 22;279(1749):4939-45. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1926. Epub 2012 Oct 17. Proc Biol Sci. 2012. PMID: 23075837 Free PMC article.
-
Natural and sexual selection in a monogamous historical human population.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 22;109(21):8044-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118174109. Epub 2012 Apr 30. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012. PMID: 22547810 Free PMC article.
-
Monogamy in marine fishes.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2004 May;79(2):351-75. doi: 10.1017/s1464793103006304. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2004. PMID: 15191228 Review.
Cited by
-
Integrating economic and evolutionary approaches to polygynous marriage.Evol Hum Sci. 2022 Oct 26;4:e52. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2022.49. eCollection 2022. Evol Hum Sci. 2022. PMID: 37588891 Free PMC article. Review.
-
No evidence that polygynous marriage is a harmful cultural practice in northern Tanzania.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 10;112(45):13827-32. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507151112. Epub 2015 Oct 26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015. PMID: 26504213 Free PMC article.
-
The expendable male hypothesis.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Sep 2;374(1780):20180080. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0080. Epub 2019 Jul 15. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31303164 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive inequality in humans and other mammals.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 30;120(22):e2220124120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220124120. Epub 2023 May 22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023. PMID: 37216525 Free PMC article.
-
Half a century of quantitative cultural evolution.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Nov 26;121(48):e2418106121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2418106121. Epub 2024 Nov 18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024. PMID: 39556730 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources