Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010:31:21-36.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103619.

Methods for investigating gene-environment interactions in candidate pathway and genome-wide association studies

Affiliations
Review

Methods for investigating gene-environment interactions in candidate pathway and genome-wide association studies

Duncan Thomas. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010.

Abstract

Despite the considerable enthusiasm about the yield of novel and replicated discoveries of genetic associations from the new generation of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), the proportion of the heritability of most complex diseases that have been studied to date remains small. Some of this "dark matter" could be due to gene-environment (G x E) interactions or more complex pathways involving multiple genes and exposures. We review the basic epidemiologic study design and statistical analysis approaches to studying G x E interactions individually and then consider more comprehensive approaches to studying entire pathways or GWAS data. In addition to the usual issues in genetic association studies, particular care is needed in exposure assessment, and very large sample sizes are required. Although hypothesis-driven, pathway-based and agnostic GWA study approaches are generally viewed as opposite poles, we suggest that the two can be usefully married using hierarchical modeling strategies that exploit external pathway knowledge in mining genome-wide data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual basis for G×E interactions in bladder and colon cancer (33, 65, 71)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of a four-way interaction among two environmental factors, well done red meat (R/M = rare-medium, WD = well done) and smoking, and two genes, CYP1A2 phenotype (L = ≤ median; H = > median) and NAT2 (S/I = slow-intermediate, R = rapid). Data from Table 6 of (65), risks scaled separately for ever and never smokers (baseline RR = 1.29 (95%CI 0.7–2.3)).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albert PS, Ratnasinghe D, Tangrea J, Wacholder S. Limitations of the case-only design for identifying gene-environment interactions. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154:687–93. - PubMed
    1. Altshuler D, Daly MJ, Lander ES. Genetic mapping in human disease. Science. 2008;322:881–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrieu N, Goldstein AM, Thomas DC, Langholz B. Counter-matching in studies of gene-environment interaction: efficiency and feasibility. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153:265–74. - PubMed
    1. Armitage P, Doll R. The age distribution of cancer and a multistage theory of carcinogenesis. Br J Cancer. 1954;8:1–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernstein JL, Langholz B, Haile RW, Bernstein L, Thomas DC, et al. Study design: evaluating gene-environment interactions in the etiology of breast cancer - the WECARE study. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6:R199–214. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources