Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Spring;16(1):51-60.
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2009.00119.x.

Switching from oral cholinesterase inhibitors to the rivastigmine transdermal patch

Affiliations
Review

Switching from oral cholinesterase inhibitors to the rivastigmine transdermal patch

C Sadowsky et al. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2010 Spring.

Abstract

Oral cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are associated with side effects such as nausea and vomiting. The use of transdermal patches for ChEI delivery may help to minimize these problems. The objective of this review was to consider available data from patients switching from oral ChEIs to transdermal rivastigmine treatment, and to suggest practical guidelines for patients wishing to do this. Literature database and reference list searches were performed to identify suitable publications. Data from two clinical trials and a series of open observational studies, in which patients were switched to the rivastigmine patch from oral rivastigmine, donepezil tablets, or galantamine, were evaluated. Adverse events were tabulated. In the studies reported here, nausea was reported in up to 3.2% and vomiting in up to 1.9% of patients switching to the rivastigmine patch from oral rivastigmine. Similar rates (up to 3.8% of patients for nausea and 0.8% of patients for vomiting) were reported when switching to the rivastigmine patch from donepezil tablets, and no nausea or vomiting was reported in a case study of patients switching to the rivastigmine patch from galantamine tablets. Switching regimes used in clinical trials appeared well tolerated. Data support recommendations for patients on high rivastigmine capsule doses to switch directly to the 9.5 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch, while those on lower oral rivastigmine doses should start on the 4.6 mg/24 h patch for 4 weeks before increasing to the 9.5 mg/24 h patch. This latter regimen is recommended for patients on other oral cholinesterase inhibitors if switching is medically indicated or requested by the patient or the caregiver.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study profiles of (A) the IDEAL study, switching from rivastigmine capsules to rivastigmine patch plus open‐label extension [25, 27]; and (B) the SWAP study, switching from donepezil tablets to rivastigmine patch [32].
Figure 1
Figure 1
Study profiles of (A) the IDEAL study, switching from rivastigmine capsules to rivastigmine patch plus open‐label extension [25, 27]; and (B) the SWAP study, switching from donepezil tablets to rivastigmine patch [32].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentages of patients who experienced the adverse events of nausea and vomiting after switching from rivastigmine capsules to rivastigmine patch (nausea and vomiting reported during the “switch” phase to the 9.5 mg/24 h patch [weeks 1–4 of the open‐label extension] only), and from donepezil tablets to rivastigmine patch (safety populations).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Suggested treatment algorithm for starting patients on the rivastigmine patch. *Regional differences in guidelines apply. The above represents the current European Union switching guidelines (according to the EU rivastigmine patch summary of product characteristics [34]). In the United States, if a patient is receiving <6 mg/day oral rivastigmine they can be switched to 4.6 mg/24 h patch; if a patient is receiving ≥6 mg/day they may be directly switched to 9.5 mg/24 h patch, dependent on tolerability.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rosenstein LD. Differential diagnosis of the major progressive dementias and depression in middle and late adulthood: A summary of the literature of the early 1990s. Neuropsychol Rev 1998;8:109–167. - PubMed
    1. Davies P, Maloney AJ. Selective loss of central cholinergic neurons in Alzheimer's disease. Lancet 1976;2:1403. - PubMed
    1. Cummings JL, Kaufer D. Neuropsychiatric aspects of Alzheimer's disease: The cholinergic hypothesis revisited. Neurology 1996;47:876–883. - PubMed
    1. Doody RS, Stevens JC, Beck C, et al Practice parameter: Management of dementia (an evidence‐based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2001;56:1154–1166. - PubMed
    1. Enz A, Boddeke H, Gray J, Spiegel R. Pharmacologic and clinicopharmacologic properties of SDZ ENA 713, a centrally selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1991;640:272–275. - PubMed