Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan 13:9:14.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-14.

Shift in epitope dominance of IgM and IgG responses to Plasmodium falciparum MSP1 block 4

Affiliations

Shift in epitope dominance of IgM and IgG responses to Plasmodium falciparum MSP1 block 4

Sandra P Chang et al. Malar J. .

Abstract

Background: Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP1) has been extensively studied as a blood-stage malaria vaccine candidate, with most work focused on the conserved 19 kDa and semi-conserved 42 kDa C-terminal regions (blocks 16-17) and the hypervariable N-terminal repeat region (block 2). However, recent genotyping studies suggest that additional regions of MSP1 may be under selective pressure, including a locus of intragenic recombination designated as block 4 within the 3' region of the gene.

Methods: The current study examined the antibody response to the two parental and two recombinant forms of block 4 and to blocks 16-17 (3D7) in study populations from Colombia, Papua New Guinea and Cameroon that differ in malaria transmission intensity and ethnic composition.

Results: IgM and IgG antibodies were detected against parental and recombinant MSP1 block 4 peptides in all three populations. Overall, 32-44% of the individuals produced IgM to one or more of the peptides, with most individuals having IgM antibodies reactive with both parental and recombinant forms. In contrast, IgG seropositivity to block 4 varied among populations (range 15-65%), with the majority of antibodies showing specificity for one or a pair of block 4 peptides. The IgG response to block 4 was significantly lower than that to blocks 16-17, indicating block 4 is subdominant. Antibodies to block 4 and blocks 16-17 displayed distinct IgG subclass biases, with block 4 responses biased toward IgG3 and blocks 16-17 toward IgG1. These patterns of responsiveness were consistently observed in the three study populations.

Conclusions: Production of antibodies specific for each parental and recombinant MSP1 block 4 allele in different populations exposed to P. falciparum is consistent with balancing selection of the MSP1 block 4 region by the immune response of individuals in areas of both low and high malaria transmission. MSP1 block 4 determinants may be important in isolate-specific immunity to P. falciparum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
IgM responses to MSP1 Block 4 and Blocks 16-17. (A) Seroprevalence based on n = 111 Colombian, n = 22 Papua New Guinean and n = 72 Cameroonian samples. (B) Mean antibody levels (MFI units) for positive samples. Error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean.
Figure 2
Figure 2
IgG responses to MSP1 Block 4 and Blocks 16-17. (A) Seroprevalence based on n = 111 Colombian, n = 22 Papua New Guinean and n = 64 Cameroonian samples. (B) Mean antibody levels (MFI units) for positive samples. Error bars correspond to standard error of the mean. Significantly different mean MFI values ( P ≤ 0.05) are indicated with an asterisk.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall seroprevalence of IgM or IgG antibodies to MSP1 Block 4 and Blocks 16-17. Seroprevalence based on n = 111 Colombian, n = 22 Papua New Guinea and n = 64 Cameroonian samples.
Figure 4
Figure 4
IgG subclass distribution of MSP1 Block 4 and Block 16-17. Sera from samples that contained antibodies to one or more Block 4 peptides (left panel) or Blocks 16-17 (right panel) were assayed for IgG1 and IgG3 isotypes. Colombia (n = 21), Papua New Guinea (n = 9), and Cameroon (n = 11). Clustering of isotype distribution is indicated by ellipses.
Figure 5
Figure 5
IgG subclass responses to MSP1 Block 4 and Blocks 16-17. (A) IgG1 and (B) IgG3 seroprevalences based on n = 21 Colombian, n = 9 Papua New Guinean and n = 11 Cameroonian samples.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Cord Blood IgM responses to MSP1 Block 4 and Blocks 16-17. Mean antibody levels (MFI units) for cord blood samples from Papua New Guinea. Asterisks indicate samples that were above adult cut-off values for the individual peptides.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Mapping of dimorphic allelic IgG MSP1 Block 4 epitopes. Human antibodies that reacted with Block 4-1 and 4-3 (black) and with Block 4-2 and 4-4 (blue) recognized allelic sequences indicated by asterisks within the boxed region.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blackman MJ, Heidrich HG, Donachie S, McBride JS, Holder AA. A single fragment of a malaria merozoite surface protein remains on the parasite during red cell invasion and is the target of invasion-inhibiting antibodies. J Exp Med. 1990;172:379–382. doi: 10.1084/jem.172.1.379. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tanabe K, Mackay M, Goman M, Scaife JG. Allelic dimorphism in a surface antigen gene of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. J Mol Biol. 1987;195:273–287. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90649-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sakihama N, Kimura M, Hirayama K, Kanda T, Na-Bangchang K, Jongwutiwes S, Conway D, Tanabe K. Allelic recombination and linkage disequilibrium within Msp-1 of Plasmodium falciparum, the malignant human malaria parasite. Gene. 1999;230:47–54. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00069-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tanabe K, Sakihama N, Walliker D, Babiker H, Abdel-Muhsin AM, Bakote'e B, Ohmae H, Arisue N, Horii T, Rooth I, Färnert A, Björkman A, Ranford-Cartwright L. Allelic dimorphism-associated restriction of recombination in Plasmodium falciparum msp1. Gene. 2007;397:153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.04.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Terrientes ZI, Vergara J, Kramer K, Herrera S, Chang SP. Restricted genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum major merozoite surface protein 1 in isolates from Colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:S55–61. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms