Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;125(4):1146-1156.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d18196.

Subtotal thigh flap and bioprosthetic mesh reconstruction for large, composite abdominal wall defects

Affiliations

Subtotal thigh flap and bioprosthetic mesh reconstruction for large, composite abdominal wall defects

Samuel J Lin et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Transposition of well-vascularized flap tissue with or without implantable mesh is often required to repair full-thickness, composite abdominal wall defects. The authors hypothesized that the combination of an inlay of bioprosthetic mesh and a subtotal thigh flap would enable a reliable reconstruction for large, composite abdominal wall defects.

Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed data on patients who underwent repair of large, composite abdominal wall defects with bioprosthetic mesh and free or pedicled subtotal thigh flaps at a major cancer center from 2004 to 2007. Patient, defect, surgical technique, and outcome data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database and medical charts.

Results: Seven patients who received eight subtotal thigh flaps (five pedicled and three free flaps with vein grafts to the femoral vessels) met the study criteria. Indications for reconstruction were tumor resection, enterocutaneous fistula, and abdominal wall osteoradionecrosis. All but one patient received preoperative radiotherapy (mean dose, 54.8 Gy). The musculofascial defect was repaired with a mean of 536.4 cm2 of bioprosthetic mesh. The mean subtotal thigh flap skin paddle size was 514 cm2. Complications included partial flap necrosis in one patient, a cerebrospinal fluid leak in one patient, partial split-thickness skin graft loss in two patients, a focal asymptomatic musculofascial repair-site bulge in one patient, and a hernia (not requiring surgery) in one patient. No bioprosthetic mesh infections, wound dehiscences, bowel obstructions, or seromas occurred (mean follow-up, 27.7 months).

Conclusion: Massive, composite abdominal wall defects can be repaired successfully with relatively minor complications using a combination of bioprosthetic mesh and subtotal thigh flaps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nahai F, Hill L, Hester TR. Experiences with the tensor fasciae latae flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63:788–799.
    1. Cunha-Gomes D, Choudhari C, Bhathena HM, Kavarana NM. The hemithigh microvascular transfer (combined anterolateral thigh flap and tensor fasciae latae flap) for a full thickness abdominal wall reconstruction: A case report. Acta Chir Plast. 1999;41:71–73.
    1. Brown DM, Sicard GA, Flye MW, Khouri RK. Closure of complex abdominal wall defects with bilateral rectus femoris flaps with fascial extensions. Surgery 1993;114:112–116.
    1. Daigeler A, Fansa H, Altmann S, Awiszus S, Schneider W. The pedicled rectus femoris muscle flap for reconstruction of complicated abdominal wall defects. Rozhl Chir. 2005;84:238–243.
    1. Tellioglu AT, Karabag O. Application of a sartorius muscle flap during abdominal wall reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42:703–705.

MeSH terms