Correlation of patient and caregiver ratings of cancer pain
- PMID: 2007792
- DOI: 10.1016/0885-3924(91)90518-9
Correlation of patient and caregiver ratings of cancer pain
Abstract
Undertreatment of cancer pain is widely recognized. This study sought to determine if inadequate communication about pain intensity between health care providers and their patients could represent a significant factor interfering with the control of cancer pain. One hundred and three consecutive patients with solid tumors and normal mental status examinations were screened within 48 hr during two study periods. The intensity of patient pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) which was given to the patient, his/her primary care nurse, house officer and medical oncology fellow. Sixty-three percent of the patients were taking narcotic analgesics on admission to the hospital. Although there was a correlation between patient and health care provider ratings for the entire group, no statistically significant correlation between the patient's VAS pain score and that of his/her nurse, house officer, or oncology fellow was present in the 44 patients with VAS greater than or equal to 4.0. Agreement between patient and caregiver VAS scores was also examined. When patients rated their pain from 7-10 on the VAS scale, nurses, house officers, and oncology fellows would place their rating of the patient's pain in this range 7%, 20%, and 27% of the time, respectively. Improved correspondence was noted with lower patient VAS scores. This study demonstrates that health care provider impressions of patient pain are often quite different than those of the patient and that these discrepancies are most pronounced in patients with significant pain. The routine use of pain assessment tools, such as the VAS, could enhance patient-caregiver communication and improve care for patients with cancer pain.
Similar articles
-
Patients' and nurses' assessment of cancer pain.Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1999 Dec;8(4):213-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.1999.00171.x. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1999. PMID: 10889618
-
Accuracy of emergency nurses in assessment of patients' pain.Pain Manag Nurs. 2003 Dec;4(4):171-5. doi: 10.1016/s1524-9042(03)00033-x. Pain Manag Nurs. 2003. PMID: 14663795
-
The patient's report of pain.Am J Nurs. 2001 Dec;101(12):73-4. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200112000-00039. Am J Nurs. 2001. PMID: 12585068 No abstract available.
-
Is pain what the patient says it is? Interpreting an account of pain.Int J Palliat Nurs. 2004 Oct;10(10):491-6. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2004.10.10.16214. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2004. PMID: 15577709 Review.
-
Improving pain management in an acute care setting. The Crawford Long Hospital of Emory University experience.Orthop Nurs. 1997 Jul-Aug;16(4):29-36. Orthop Nurs. 1997. PMID: 9287814 Review.
Cited by
-
The effectiveness of a self-reporting bedside pain assessment tool for oncology inpatients.J Palliat Med. 2012 Nov;15(11):1222-33. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0183. Epub 2012 Sep 13. J Palliat Med. 2012. PMID: 22974435 Free PMC article.
-
Health care providers underestimate symptom intensities of cancer patients: a multicenter European study.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Sep 21;8:104. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-104. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010. PMID: 20858248 Free PMC article.
-
Psychosocial aspects of cancer pain.Support Care Cancer. 1993 May;1(3):130-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00366058. Support Care Cancer. 1993. PMID: 8149139 Review.
-
Integrating pain management in clinical practice.J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2012 Mar;19(1):49-64. doi: 10.1007/s10880-012-9295-2. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2012. PMID: 22383018 Free PMC article.
-
Utilizing Multidimensional Computer Adaptive Testing to Mitigate Burden With Patient Reported Outcomes.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:320-8. eCollection 2015. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015. PMID: 26958163 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical