Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991-2006: differences in outcomes
- PMID: 20078406
- DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03422.x
Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991-2006: differences in outcomes
Abstract
Objective: To examine differences in outcomes between planned home births, occurring at home or in hospital, and planned hospital births.
Design and setting: Population-based study using South Australian perinatal data on all births and perinatal deaths during the period 1991-2006. Analysis included logistic regression adjusted for predictor variables and standardised perinatal mortality ratios.
Main outcome measures: Perinatal death, intrapartum death, death attributed to intrapartum asphyxia, Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes, use of specialised neonatal care, operative delivery, perineal injury and postpartum haemorrhage.
Results: Planned home births accounted for 0.38% of 300,011 births in South Australia. They had a perinatal mortality rate similar to that for planned hospital births (7.9 v 8.2 per 1000 births), but a sevenfold higher risk of intrapartum death (95% CI, 1.53-35.87) and a 27-fold higher risk of death from intrapartum asphyxia (95% CI, 8.02-88.83). Review of perinatal deaths in the planned home births group identified inappropriate inclusion of women with risk factors for home birth and inadequate fetal surveillance during labour. Low Apgar scores were more frequent among planned home births, and use of specialised neonatal care as well as rates of postpartum haemorrhage and severe perineal tears were lower among planned home births, but these differences were not statistically significant. Planned home births had lower caesarean section and instrumental delivery rates, and a seven times lower episiotomy rate than planned hospital births.
Conclusions: Perinatal safety of home births may be improved substantially by better adherence to risk assessment, timely transfer to hospital when needed, and closer fetal surveillance.
Comment in
-
Planned home birth in Australia: politics or science?Med J Aust. 2010 Jan 18;192(2):60-1. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03416.x. Med J Aust. 2010. PMID: 20078401 No abstract available.
-
Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991-2006: differences in outcomes.Med J Aust. 2010 Jun 21;192(12):726; author reply 727. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03721.x. Med J Aust. 2010. PMID: 20565361 No abstract available.
-
Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991-2006: differences in outcomes.Med J Aust. 2010 Jun 21;192(12):726-7; author reply 727. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03722.x. Med J Aust. 2010. PMID: 20722097 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Perinatal mortality and morbidity up to 28 days after birth among 743 070 low-risk planned home and hospital births: a cohort study based on three merged national perinatal databases.BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):720-8. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13084. Epub 2014 Sep 10. BJOG. 2015. PMID: 25204886
-
Outcomes of planned home births and planned hospital births in low-risk women in Norway between 1990 and 2007: a retrospective cohort study.Sex Reprod Healthc. 2012 Dec;3(4):147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Oct 26. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2012. PMID: 23182447
-
Perinatal and maternal outcomes in planned home and obstetric unit births in women at 'higher risk' of complications: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study.BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):741-53. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13283. Epub 2015 Jan 21. BJOG. 2015. PMID: 25603762 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):243.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.028. Epub 2010 Jul 2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20598284 Review.
-
[Planned home versus planned hospital births: adverse outcomes comparison by reviewing the international literature].Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2013 Jun;41(6):388-93. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 Jun 12. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2013. PMID: 23769011 Review. French.
Cited by
-
EMS Interventions during Planned Out-of-Hospital Births with a Midwife: A Retrospective Analysis over Four Years in the Polish Population.J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 15;12(24):7719. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247719. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38137788 Free PMC article.
-
Ten years of a publicly funded homebirth service in Victoria: Maternal and neonatal outcomes.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;62(5):664-673. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13518. Epub 2022 Mar 23. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. PMID: 35318640 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the odds of postpartum haemorrhage in planned home birth against planned hospital birth: results of an observational study of over 500,000 maternities in the UK.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Nov 19;12:130. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-130. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012. PMID: 23157856 Free PMC article.
-
Planned home deliveries in Finland, 1996-2013.J Perinatol. 2019 Feb;39(2):220-228. doi: 10.1038/s41372-018-0267-8. Epub 2018 Nov 13. J Perinatol. 2019. PMID: 30425338
-
Planned home birth: benefits, risks, and opportunities.Int J Womens Health. 2015 Apr 8;7:361-77. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S55561. eCollection 2015. Int J Womens Health. 2015. PMID: 25914559 Free PMC article. Review.