Peri-intubation hemodynamic changes during low dose fentanyl, remifentanil and sufentanil combined with etomidate for anesthetic induction
- PMID: 20079135
Peri-intubation hemodynamic changes during low dose fentanyl, remifentanil and sufentanil combined with etomidate for anesthetic induction
Abstract
Background: Although etomidate is associated with very few cardiovascular side-effects and minimal histamine release, it has a less inhibitory effect on the pharyngolaryngeal reflex. Hence, blunting the responses to endotracheal intubation is more dependent of opioids for etomidate-based anesthetic induction. This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was designed to investigate the effects of low dose remifentanil, fentanyl or sufentanil on etomidate induction with respect to hemodynamics, conscious level changes and drug consumption.
Methods: Ninety unpremedicated and normotensive patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II undergoing elective major abdominal surgery were randomly assigned in a double blinded fashion to each of the three groups: groups F, R and S. A bolus dose of fentanyl 1 microg/kg, sufentanil 0.1 microg/kg or remifentanil 1 microg/kg was given over 60 seconds in groups F, S and R, respectively. In each instance this loading dose was followed by a continuous infusion (0.1, 0.01 or 0.1 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) of fentanyl, sufentanil or remifentanil, respectively). After 5 minutes from start of opioid infusion, etomidate was titrated at a rate of 20 mg/min to a decrease in bispectral index (BIS) to 50. The time from administration of etomidate to loss of eyelash reflex or to a decrease in BIS to 50 was recorded. The blood pressure and heart rate were also recorded at different five time points. The average maximum percent changes of systolic blood pressure (|maximal or minimal measuring value-baseline|/baseline x 100%) were calculated.
Results: The time and the dosage of etomidate necessary to loss consciousness were greater in group F ((70.0 +/- 15.6) seconds; (0.35 +/- 0.05) mg/kg) than in groups S ((52.3 +/- 15.9) seconds; (0.26 +/- 0.06) mg/kg) and R ((56.2 +/- 20.2) seconds; (0.27 +/- 0.07) mg/kg) (P < 0.01). The three groups took similar time and amount of etomidate to achieve an adequate depth anesthesia (BIS = 50). The average maximum changes of systolic blood pressure were significantly different among the three groups: F, (25 +/- 6)% vs R, (13 +/- 4)% or S, (12 +/- 5)% (P < 0.001). The endotracheal intubation caused marked increases in blood pressure and heart rate in groups F and S, but not in group R, respectively (P < 0.01). The great hemodynamic changes occurred more frequently in group F than in groups R and S (P < 0.01). The incidence of heart rate decreases of more than 30% of the baselines after induction was higher in group R compared with groups F and S (P < 0.01).
Conclusions: In normotensive and unpremedicated young adult patients receiving etomidate induction, low dose remifentanil or sufentanil significantly reduced the time and the amount of etomidate taken to loss unconsciousness compared with low dose fentanyl, but similar time interval and doses of etomidate were required to acquire adequate depth of anesthesia (BIS = 50) for these three opioids. Remifentanil was more effective in blunting the cardiovascular responses to endotracheal intubation, nevertheless, accompanying significant lower heart rate after induction.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of bolus remifentanil versus bolus fentanyl for blunting cardiovascular intubation responses in children: a randomized, double-blind study.Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Jan 5;122(1):44-50. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009. PMID: 19187616 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the time to extubation after use of remifentanil or sufentanil in combination with propofol as anesthesia in adults undergoing nonemergency intracranial surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.Clin Ther. 2006 Apr;28(4):560-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.04.001. Clin Ther. 2006. PMID: 16750467 Clinical Trial.
-
Assessment of small-dose fentanyl and sufentanil blunting the cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and intubation in children.Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Jun;17(6):568-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02162.x. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007. PMID: 17498020 Clinical Trial.
-
[New opioids for general anaesthesia and in- and out-hospital analgesia].Anestezjol Intens Ter. 2008 Jan-Mar;40(1):39-43. Anestezjol Intens Ter. 2008. PMID: 19469098 Review. Polish.
-
The fentanyl/etomidate-anaesthetised beagle (FEAB) dog: a versatile in vivo model in cardiovascular safety research.J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2009 Jul-Aug;60(1):11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2009.04.195. Epub 2009 May 5. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2009. PMID: 19422925 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for attenuation of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Aug;63(2):124-9. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.2.124. Epub 2012 Aug 14. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012. PMID: 22949979 Free PMC article.
-
A randomized clinical trial comparing hemodynamic responses to ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) versus etomidate during anesthesia induction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Arch Med Sci. 2017 Aug;13(5):1102-1110. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.63193. Epub 2016 Oct 25. Arch Med Sci. 2017. PMID: 28883852 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of effects of fentanyl and remifentanil on hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation and myoclonus in elderly patients with etomidate induction.Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Jan;64(1):12-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.1.12. Epub 2013 Jan 21. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013. PMID: 23372880 Free PMC article.
-
Bibliometric and visual analysis of intraoperative hypotension from 2004 to 2022.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 16;10:1270694. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1270694. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 38045917 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial.Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jan 10;6(1):e30071. doi: 10.5812/aapm.30071. eCollection 2016 Feb. Anesth Pain Med. 2016. PMID: 27110526 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous