Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Sep;44(9):665-8.

[Effect of general anesthesia used in cesarean section on maternal-neonatal outcome of pregnancy complicated with severe thrombocytopenia]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 20079177
Randomized Controlled Trial

[Effect of general anesthesia used in cesarean section on maternal-neonatal outcome of pregnancy complicated with severe thrombocytopenia]

[Article in Chinese]
Jun Wei et al. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of general anesthesia on pregnancy women with thrombocytopenia and neonate during cesarean section (CS).

Methods: Sixty-five singleton pregnant women with low platelet count (< 50 x 10(9)/L) and gestation>35 weeks were allocated into general anesthesia group (35 cases) and local anesthesia group (30 cases) randomly. The time from skin incision to fetal delivery, the oxyhemoglobin saturation (SO2) before and after anesthesia, the blood loss during operation, Apgar scores at 1 min, birth weight,umbilical cord blood gas analysis were recorded.

Results: The mean time from anesthesia induction to fetal delivery was (9.7 +/- 3.5) minutes in general anesthesia group. The time from skin incision to fetal delivery in general anesthesia group [(7.7 +/- 2.5) minutes] was shorter than that in local anesthesia group [(12.5 +/- 3.0) minutes, P < 0.01], while the operation time had no significant differences. There were no significant difference for the value of SO2 before and after general anesthesia or local anesthesia (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference for the blood loss [(471 +/- 245) ml vs. (452 +/- 213) ml, P > 0.05], Apgar scores at 1 minute, birth weight and umbilical cord blood gas analysis between the two groups (P > 0.05). There had two infants with blue asphyxia in local anesthesia group while no infant with asphyxia in general anesthesia group.

Conclusion: General anesthesia is safe to pregnant women with thrombocytopenia during CS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types