Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Feb;19(1):7-15.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2009.12.001. Epub 2010 Jan 15.

A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing reactive air and active alternating pressure mattresses in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers among medical ICU patients

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing reactive air and active alternating pressure mattresses in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers among medical ICU patients

Manu Malbrain et al. J Tissue Viability. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Data on the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers (PU's) among ICU patients is sparse.

Objective: To compare PU outcomes in medial ICU patients nursed on either a reactive mattress overlay (ROHO, ROHO Inc, Belleville, IL, USA) or an active alternating pressure mattress (NIMBUS3, ArjoHuntleigh, Luton Bedfordshire, UK).

Design: Pilot prospective single blind randomised controlled clinical trial.

Intervention: Two types of pressure redistributing mattress.

Patients: Two groups of eight patients.

Methods: Patients included in the study were those at high risk (Norton scale <8) or with a PU on admission.

Results: The two groups had similar patient characteristics. However, the NIMBUS 3 group presented with more ulcers per patient on admission (62.5%) and more severe ulcers (20% category 3) while four patients (50%) presented with a single superficial ulcer in the ROHO group. HEALING: The progress of the ulcers showed significant decreases in PU surface area (p=0.05), total PUSH tool score (p=0.01) in the NIMBUS 3 group compared to the ROHO group. In the NIMBUS 3 group 82% of the ulcers improved versus none in the ROHO group (p=0.002) and 18% remained stable versus 33%. None of the ulcers deteriorated in the NIMBUS 3 group versus 67% in the ROHO group (p=0.006). Full thickness wounds (Category 3) were present in 22% of the NIMBUS 3 group versus 0% of the ROHO group on admission and in 0% versus 66.7% (p=0.008) respectively at the end of the pilot study.

Prevention: Non-blanching erythema occurred equally in both arms at baseline; skin remained intact for the NIMBUS 3 group while 50% in the ROHO group worsened with superficial tissue loss.

Conclusion: This small pilot study suggests that 'active' alternating therapy is a useful adjunct in the care of highly vulnerable patients, while the outcomes may be less favourable when using 'reactive', constant low pressure devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources