Surgical site infection after osteotomy of the adult spine: does type of osteotomy matter?
- PMID: 20080066
- DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.11.017
Surgical site infection after osteotomy of the adult spine: does type of osteotomy matter?
Abstract
Background context: Surgical site infection after spinal surgery is frequently seen. It occurs between 0.7% and 12% of patients, leading to higher morbidity, mortality, and health-care costs. Osteotomy procedures are known to have increased blood losses and surgical times when compared with other spinal surgeries. Both of these factors have previously been identified as significant risk factors for SSI. We performed a cohort study of this high-risk population to identify risk factors and rates of SSI after spinal osteotomy surgery and identify difference in risk between different types of osteotomies.
Purpose: The objective of the study was to assess the incidence and identify significant risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal osteotomy.
Study design: Retrospective review of all adult patients who underwent spinal osteotomy surgery for deformity by an orthopedic surgeon in our university.
Methods: All electronic records of adult orthopedic patients whom underwent a spinal osteotomy procedure at our department between January 1998 and December 2005 (n=363) were abstracted. During surgery, a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (transpedicular wedge resection), anterior spine osteotomy (resection of anterior and middle columns), posterior Smith-Petersen osteotomy (resection of a portion of the superior and inferior lamina, ligamentum flavum, and the inferior and superior articular processed), or a combined anterior and posterior osteotomy (vertebral column resection [VCR]) (circumferential resection of the vertebrae via either a combined anterior/posterior or posterior-only approach) was performed. Primary outcome measurement was SSI. Subanalysis to deep and superficial SSI was performed.
Results: Twenty patients (5.5%) were found to have an SSI, with nine (2.5%) having deep SSI. Analysis showed that patients undergoing VCR (p=.042) had a significant increased risk for deep SSI (11.1%). Obese patients had a significant increased risk (p=.045) for superficial SSI.
Conclusions: Vertebral column resection has a significant increased risk for SSI (11.1%) compared with other types of osteotomies (4.1%). When possible, osteotomy techniques that involve less extensive exposures and soft-tissue dissection should be chosen to minimize deep SSI risk. Obese patients should be counseled on weight loss to try minimizing superficial SSI risk.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
The effect of type of osteotomy on the risk of postoperative spinal infections.Spine J. 2010 May;10(5):451-3. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.03.028. Spine J. 2010. PMID: 20421078 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Incidence, prevalence, and analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection following adult spinal surgery.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jun 1;34(13):1422-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a03013. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. PMID: 19478664
-
Influence of perioperative resuscitation status on postoperative spine surgery complications.Spine J. 2010 Feb;10(2):129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.10.002. Epub 2009 Nov 14. Spine J. 2010. PMID: 19914877
-
Intraoperative fraction of inspired oxygen is a modifiable risk factor for surgical site infection after spinal surgery.Anesthesiology. 2009 Mar;110(3):556-62. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181974be7. Anesthesiology. 2009. PMID: 19225396
-
Decision making regarding Smith-Petersen vs. pedicle subtraction osteotomy vs. vertebral column resection for spinal deformity.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Sep 1;31(19 Suppl):S171-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000231963.72810.38. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006. PMID: 16946635 Review.
-
The role of posterior spinal osteotomies in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: indications and operative technique.J Pediatr Orthop. 2011 Jan-Feb;31(1 Suppl):S88-98. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181f73bd4. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011. PMID: 21173625 Review.
Cited by
-
MIS revision of de novo scoliosis and stenosis, following open spinal instrumentation.Eur Spine J. 2016 Dec;25(Suppl 4):476-479. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4760-5. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 27671275 No abstract available.
-
A methodological, systematic review of evidence-based independent risk factors for surgical site infections after spinal surgery.Eur Spine J. 2013 Mar;22(3):605-15. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2514-6. Epub 2012 Sep 22. Eur Spine J. 2013. PMID: 23001381 Free PMC article.
-
What are the risk factors for surgical site infection after spinal fusion? A meta-analysis.Eur Spine J. 2018 Oct;27(10):2469-2480. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5733-7. Epub 2018 Aug 20. Eur Spine J. 2018. PMID: 30128761
-
Vertebral Column Resection for Rigid Spinal Deformity.Global Spine J. 2017 May;7(3):280-290. doi: 10.1177/2192568217699203. Epub 2017 Apr 7. Global Spine J. 2017. PMID: 28660112 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perioperative Medical Complications in Adult Spine Deformity Surgery: Classification and Prevention Strategies.Global Spine J. 2025 Jul;15(3_suppl):148S-158S. doi: 10.1177/21925682241264227. Epub 2025 Jul 9. Global Spine J. 2025. PMID: 40632288 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources