Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 26;113(17):4591-6.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813125107. Epub 2010 Jan 11.

Linking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management

Affiliations

Linking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management

Katharine Jacobs et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Managing water for sustainable use and economic development is both a technical and a governance challenge in which knowledge production and sharing play a central role. This article evaluates and compares the role of participatory governance and scientific information in decision-making in four basins in Brazil, Mexico, Thailand, and the United States. Water management institutions in each of the basins have evolved during the last 10-20 years from a relatively centralized water-management structure at the state or national level to a decision structure that involves engaging water users within the basins and the development of participatory processes. This change is consistent with global trends in which states increasingly are expected to gain public acceptance for larger water projects and policy changes. In each case, expanded citizen engagement in identifying options and in decision-making processes has resulted in more complexity but also has expanded the culture of integrated learning. International funding for water infrastructure has been linked to requirements for participatory management processes, but, ironically, this study finds that participatory processes appear to work better in the context of decisions that are short-term and easily adjusted, such as water-allocation decisions, and do not work so well for longer-term, high-stakes decisions regarding infrastructure. A second important observation is that the costs of capacity building to allow meaningful stakeholder engagement in water-management decision processes are not widely recognized. Failure to appreciate the associated costs and complexities may contribute to the lack of successful engagement of citizens in decisions regarding infrastructure.

Keywords: public participation; stakeholder engagement; water management; water sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Biswas AK, Varis O, Tortajada C, editors. Integrated Water Resources Management in South and Southeast Asia. Oxford Univ Press; Oxford, UK: 2005.
    1. Lach D, Rayner S, Ingram H. Taming the waters: Strategies to domesticate the wicked problems of water resource management. Int J Water. 2005;3:1–17.
    1. van Kerkhoff L, Lebel L. Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2006;31:445–477.
    1. Cash DW, Borck JC, Patt AG. Countering the loading-dock approach to linking science and decision making. Sci Technol Human Values. 2006;31:465–494.
    1. Jacobs K, Pulwarty R. Water resource management: Science, planning and decision-making. In: Lawford R, Fort D, Hartmann H, Eden S, editors. Water: Science, Policy, and Management. American Geophysical Union; Washington, DC: 2003.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources