Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan 12;107(2):838-43.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912134107. Epub 2009 Dec 22.

Efficacy of ST-246 versus lethal poxvirus challenge in immunodeficient mice

Affiliations

Efficacy of ST-246 versus lethal poxvirus challenge in immunodeficient mice

Douglas W Grosenbach et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

The threat of smallpox as a bioweapon and the emerging threat of human monkeypox, among other poxviral diseases, highlight the need for effective poxvirus countermeasures. ST-246, which targets the F13L protein in vaccinia virus and its homologs in other orthopoxvirus species, provides full protection from lethal poxviral disease in numerous animal models and seems to be safe in humans. All previous evaluations of ST-246 efficacy have been in immunocompetent animals. However, the risk of severe poxviral disease is greater in immunodeficient hosts. Here we report on the efficacy of ST-246 in preventing or treating lethal poxviral disease in immunodeficient mice. After lethal challenge with the Western Reserve strain of vaccinia, Nude, SCID, and J(H) knockout mice additionally depleted of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells were not fully protected by ST-246, although survival was significantly extended. However, CD4(+) T cell deficient, CD8(+) T cell deficient, J(H) knockout, and J(H) knockout mice also deficient for CD4(+) or CD8(+) T cells survived lethal challenge when treated with ST-246 starting on the day of challenge. Delaying treatment until 72 h after infection reduced ST-246 efficacy in some models but provided full protection from lethal challenge in most. These findings suggest that ST-246 may be effective in controlling smallpox or other pathogenic orthopoxviruses in some immunodeficient human populations for whom the vaccine is contraindicated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: All authors are employed by SIGA Technologies.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Virulence of F13L-KO in Nude and SCID mice. Nude and SCID mice (as indicated in each panel) were intranasally challenged (day 0) with the wild-type VV-WR (WR) or the F13L-KO virus (KO) at doses ranging from 102 pfu to 106 pfu, as indicated in the legend. Survival percentages are shown. Legend applies to both panels.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Efficacy of ST-246 vs. lethal VV-WR challenge in Nude and SCID mice. Nude and SCID mice (as indicated in each panel) were intranasally challenged (day 0) with the wild-type VV-WR at doses ranging from 103 pfu to 105 pfu. At each challenge dose (as indicated in the legend), one group was treated with vehicle (Veh.) (dashed lines), and the other was treated with ST-246 (solid lines) for 21 consecutive days. Mice were monitored for evidence of disease and were killed if moribund. Survival percentages are shown. Legend applies to both panels.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Efficacy of ST-246 vs. lethal VV-WR challenge in B cell and/or T cell deficient mice. Immunodeficient mice (as indicated in the legend) and BALB/c mice as controls were intranasally challenged with a 10 × LD50 dose of the wild-type VV-WR on day 0 (n = 5 mice per group). Each immunodeficient mouse model was treated daily with vehicle (dashed lines) or with ST-246 (solid lines) for 14 consecutive days starting at the time of challenge. (A) Survival percentages after challenge. (B) Average weights reported as a percentage of the starting weight. Weight observations were discontinued when animals died (≈70% starting weight) or recovered weight approached 100%. (C) Average disease scores.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Henderson DA. The looming threat of bioterrorism. Science. 1999;283:1279–1282. - PubMed
    1. Henderson DA, et al. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense. Smallpox as a biological weapon: Medical and public health management. JAMA. 1999;281:2127–2137. - PubMed
    1. Fleck F. Conference warns of danger of re-emergence of smallpox as weapon of bioterror. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81:917–918. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hutin YJ, et al. Outbreak of human monkeypox, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996 to 1997. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:434–438. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parker S, Nuara A, Buller RM, Schultz DA. Human monkeypox: An emerging zoonotic disease. Future Microbiol. 2007;2:17–34. - PubMed

Publication types