A neuroeconomic theory of the decision process
- PMID: 20080787
- PMCID: PMC2799727
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912500106
A neuroeconomic theory of the decision process
Abstract
We develop a neuronal theory of the choice process (NTCP), which takes a subject from the moment in which two options are presented to the selection of one of the two. The theory is based on an optimal signal detection, which generalizes the signal detection theory by adding the choice of effort as optimal choice for a given informational value of the signal for every effort level and a cost of effort. NTCP predicts the choice made as a stochastic choice: That is, as a probability distribution over two options in a set, the level of effort provided, the error rate, and the time to respond. The theory provides a unified account of behavioral evidence (choices made, error rate, time to respond) as well as neural evidence (represented by the effort rate measured for example by the level of brain activation). The theory also provides a unified explanation of several facts discovered and interpreted in the last decades of experimental economic analysis of choices, which we review.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Can Neuroscience Assist Us in Constructing Better Patterns of Economic Decision-Making?Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Oct 10;11:188. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00188. eCollection 2017. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 29066963 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neural Mechanisms for Adaptive Learned Avoidance of Mental Effort.J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2631-2651. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1995-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 5. J Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29431647 Free PMC article.
-
The Attraction Effect Modulates Reward Prediction Errors and Intertemporal Choices.J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 11;37(2):371-382. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2532-16.2016. J Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28077716 Free PMC article.
-
Neural correlates of effort-based behavioral inconsistency.Cortex. 2019 Apr;113:96-110. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 15. Cortex. 2019. PMID: 30634107
-
Dopamine, Effort-Based Choice, and Behavioral Economics: Basic and Translational Research.Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Mar 23;12:52. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00052. eCollection 2018. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29628879 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Rational Attention and Adaptive Coding: A Puzzle and a Solution.Am Econ Rev. 2014 May;104(5):507-513. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.5.507. Am Econ Rev. 2014. PMID: 25484369 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Local dynamics in decision making: The evolution of preference within and across decisions.Sci Rep. 2013;3:2210. doi: 10.1038/srep02210. Sci Rep. 2013. PMID: 23860466 Free PMC article.
-
Event-Related Potentials during a Gambling Task in Young Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Feb 27;12:79. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00079. eCollection 2018. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29535621 Free PMC article.
-
Mice learn to avoid regret.PLoS Biol. 2018 Jun 21;16(6):e2005853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005853. eCollection 2018 Jun. PLoS Biol. 2018. PMID: 29927938 Free PMC article.
-
Irrational time allocation in decision-making.Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 13;283(1822):20151439. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1439. Proc Biol Sci. 2016. PMID: 26763695 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gilboa I, Schmeidler D. Maximin expected utility with non-unique prior. J Math Econ. 1989;18:141–153.
-
- Dehaene S. How the Mind Creates Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press; 1999. The Number Sense.
-
- Thurstone LL. The indifference function. J Soc Psychol. 1931;2:139–167.
-
- Edwards W. The theory of decision making. Phychol Bull. 1954;51:380–417. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources