The minimally important difference in clinical practice for patient-centered outcomes including health assessment questionnaire, fatigue, pain, sleep, global visual analog scale, and SF-36 in scleroderma
- PMID: 20080913
- DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090375
The minimally important difference in clinical practice for patient-centered outcomes including health assessment questionnaire, fatigue, pain, sleep, global visual analog scale, and SF-36 in scleroderma
Abstract
Objective: We studied a large clinical practice and multicenter database to estimate the minimally important difference (MID) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) using global rating of change anchors for the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and visual analog scale (VAS) in pain, fatigue, sleep, global status, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) in clinical practice.
Methods: Longitudinal data were collected from a scleroderma clinic on patients with scleroderma (n = 109) who had completed the HAQ-DI and pain/fatigue/sleep/global status VAS (0 to 100 mm) questionnaires at 2 consecutive visits, and rated their change in overall status since the last visit as much better, better, same, worse, or much worse. Data were extracted from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CSRG) database (n = 341) for 2 consecutive annual visits where the patients had completed HAQ-DI and SF-36, and the SF-36 "change in health" item.
Results: For the single site, the mean baseline HAQ-DI was 0.895 and 0.911 at followup, with a mean change of 0.016. The MID estimates for improvement and worsening respectively were -0.0125 (0.125, 75th percentile)/0.042 (0.217, 75th percentile) for HAQ-DI, -8.00/3.61 for pain, -10.00/3.79 (25.32) for fatigue, -18.50/5.92 for sleep, and -6.70/4.05 for global VAS. In the CSRG, baseline scores were 0.787 for HAQ-DI, 37.20 for the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of SF-36, and 48.57 for the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The MID estimates for improvement and worsening were -0.037 (0.250, 75th percentile)/0.140 (0.375, 75th percentile) for HAQ-DI, 2.18/-1.74 for PCS, and 1.33/-2.61 for MCS.
Conclusion: This study provides MID estimates in SSc from 2 large databases for commonly used patient-reported outcomes in a clinical practice setting, which could differ from MID in trials.
Similar articles
-
The minimally important difference for patient reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus including the HAQ-DI, pain, fatigue, and SF-36.J Rheumatol. 2009 Oct;36(10):2231-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090193. Epub 2009 Sep 1. J Rheumatol. 2009. PMID: 19723907
-
Minimally important difference for patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis: Health Assessment Questionnaire and pain, fatigue, and global visual analog scales.J Rheumatol. 2010 May;37(5):1024-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090832. Epub 2010 Mar 15. J Rheumatol. 2010. PMID: 20231193
-
The minimally important difference for the health assessment questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis clinical practice is smaller than in randomized controlled trials.J Rheumatol. 2009 Feb;36(2):254-9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080479. J Rheumatol. 2009. PMID: 19132791
-
Measures of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma): Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Scleroderma HAQ (SHAQ), physician- and patient-rated global assessments, Symptom Burden Index (SBI), University of California, Los Angeles, Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal Scale (UCLA SCTC GIT) 2.0, Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) and Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) (Mahler's Index), Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR), and Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS).Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S98-111. doi: 10.1002/acr.20598. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011. PMID: 22588774 Review. No abstract available.
-
The impact of systemic sclerosis on health-related quality of life assessed by SF-36: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 Nov;21(11):1884-1893. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13438. Epub 2018 Nov 14. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018. PMID: 30428506
Cited by
-
Stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 29;7(7):CD011819. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011819.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35904231 Free PMC article.
-
Use of the Patient-generated Index in systemic sclerosis to assess patient-centered outcomes.J Rheumatol. 2013 Aug;40(8):1337-43. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120978. Epub 2013 Jun 15. J Rheumatol. 2013. PMID: 23772081 Free PMC article.
-
The long-term course of the Health Assessment Questionnaire in patients with systemic sclerosis.J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2023 Oct;8(3):192-202. doi: 10.1177/23971983231181719. Epub 2023 Jun 21. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2023. PMID: 37744048 Free PMC article.
-
Minimal important differences for fatigue patient reported outcome measures-a systematic review.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 May 26;16:62. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0167-6. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016. PMID: 27387456 Free PMC article.
-
Unmet Needs in Systemic Sclerosis Understanding and Treatment: the Knowledge Gaps from a Scientist's, Clinician's, and Patient's Perspective.Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018 Dec;55(3):312-331. doi: 10.1007/s12016-017-8636-1. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018. PMID: 28866756 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical