Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;21(5):569-78.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1081-9. Epub 2010 Jan 16.

Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a Dutch version of the prolapse quality-of-life (P-QoL) questionnaire

Affiliations

Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a Dutch version of the prolapse quality-of-life (P-QoL) questionnaire

Filip Claerhout et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 May.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: We aimed to test validity, reliability and responsiveness of a Dutch version of a prolapse quality-of-life questionnaire (P-QoL).

Methods: P-QoL was translated into Dutch and adjusted by a panel of five experts. The scores of the final version were compared between symptomatic (n = 160) and asymptomatic (n = 80) patients and with findings on vaginal examination (pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q)). In terms of reliability, Cronbach's alpha was calculated, and a test-retest (n = 20) was performed. Responsiveness to treatment was assessed by comparing pre- and postoperative scores in 45 patients.

Results: Total scores for each P-QoL domain were different between symptomatic and asymptomatic women (p < 0.001). Severity according to P-QoL correlated well with POP-Q findings. Cronbach's alphas showed internal consistency within the domains. Test-retest reliability was high. Pre- and postoperative scores for each domain were significantly different (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The Dutch version of P-QoL is valid, reliable and responsive to assess quality-of-life and symptoms in Dutch-speaking patients with urogenital prolapse.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Neurourol Urodyn. 2003;22(2):97-104 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Aug;167(2):399-404; discussion 404-5 - PubMed
    1. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 May 28;2:27 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;189(2):372-7; discussion 377-9 - PubMed
    1. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 May-Jun;16(3):176-81; discussion 181 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources