Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a Dutch version of the prolapse quality-of-life (P-QoL) questionnaire
- PMID: 20082065
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-1081-9
Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a Dutch version of the prolapse quality-of-life (P-QoL) questionnaire
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: We aimed to test validity, reliability and responsiveness of a Dutch version of a prolapse quality-of-life questionnaire (P-QoL).
Methods: P-QoL was translated into Dutch and adjusted by a panel of five experts. The scores of the final version were compared between symptomatic (n = 160) and asymptomatic (n = 80) patients and with findings on vaginal examination (pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q)). In terms of reliability, Cronbach's alpha was calculated, and a test-retest (n = 20) was performed. Responsiveness to treatment was assessed by comparing pre- and postoperative scores in 45 patients.
Results: Total scores for each P-QoL domain were different between symptomatic and asymptomatic women (p < 0.001). Severity according to P-QoL correlated well with POP-Q findings. Cronbach's alphas showed internal consistency within the domains. Test-retest reliability was high. Pre- and postoperative scores for each domain were significantly different (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The Dutch version of P-QoL is valid, reliable and responsive to assess quality-of-life and symptoms in Dutch-speaking patients with urogenital prolapse.
References
-
- Neurourol Urodyn. 2003;22(2):97-104 - PubMed
-
- Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Aug;167(2):399-404; discussion 404-5 - PubMed
-
- Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 May 28;2:27 - PubMed
-
- Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;189(2):372-7; discussion 377-9 - PubMed
-
- Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 May-Jun;16(3):176-81; discussion 181 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
