Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;395(6):737-45.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-009-0576-7. Epub 2010 Jan 19.

Cancellations of (helicopter-transported) mobile medical team dispatches in the Netherlands

Affiliations

Cancellations of (helicopter-transported) mobile medical team dispatches in the Netherlands

Georgios F Giannakopoulos et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The trauma centre of the Trauma Center Region North-West Netherlands (TRNWN) has consensus criteria for Mobile Medical Team (MMT) scene dispatch. The MMT can be dispatched by the EMS-dispatch centre or by the on-scene ambulance crew and is transported by helicopter or ground transport. Although much attention has been paid to improve the dispatch criteria, the MMT is often cancelled after being dispatched. The aim of this study was to assess the cancellation rate and the noncompliant dispatches of our MMT and to identify factors associated with this form of primary overtriage.

Methods: By retrospective analysis of all MMT dispatches in the period from 1 July 2006 till 31 December 2006 using chart review, we conducted a consecutive case review of 605 dispatches. Four hundred and sixty seven of these were included for our study, collecting data related to prehospital triage, patient's condition on-scene and hospital course.

Results: Average age was 35.9 years; the majority of the patients were male (65.3%). Four hundred and thirty patients were victims of trauma, sustaining injuries in most cases from blunt trauma (89.3%). After being dispatched, the MMT was cancelled 203 times (43.5%). Statistically significant differences between assists and cancellations were found for overall mortality, mean RTS, GCS and ISS, mean hospitalization, length and amount of ICU admissions (p < 0.001). All dispatches were evaluated by using the MMT-dispatch criteria and mission appropriateness criteria. Almost 26% of all dispatches were neither appropriate, nor met the dispatch criteria. Fourteen missions were appropriate, but did not meet the dispatch criteria. The remaining 318 dispatches had met the dispatch criteria, of which 135 (30.3%) were also appropriate. The calculated additional costs of the cancelled dispatches summed up to a total of 34,448 euro, amounting to 2.2% of the total MMT costs during the study period.

Conclusion: In our trauma system, the MMT dispatches are involved with high rates of overtriage. After being dispatched, the MMT is cancelled in almost 50% of all cases. We found an undertriage rate of 4%, which we think is acceptable. All cancellations were justified. The additional costs of the cancelled missions were within an acceptable range. According to this study, it seems to be possible to reduce the overtriage rate of the MMT dispatches, without increasing the undertriage rate to non-acceptable levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mobile Medical Teams in the Netherlands
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
MMT dispatch criteria TRNWN
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Study population
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Evaluation of the dispatches by using MMT-dispatch criteria and mission appropriateness criteria
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Patient's injuries per AIS anatomical region

Comment in

  • Human errors in (inhuman?) triage.
    Tourtier JP, Mangouka L, Lemoullec D. Tourtier JP, et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Nov;395(8):1175-6; author reply 1177-8. doi: 10.1007/s00423-010-0610-9. Epub 2010 Jun 30. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010. PMID: 20589394 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Utter GH, Maier RV, Rivara FP, et al. Inclusive trauma systems: do they improve triage or outcomes of the severely injured? J Trauma. 2006;60:529–535. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000204022.36214.9e. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Celso B, Tepas J, Langland-Orban B, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems. J Trauma. 2006;60:371–378. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197916.99629.eb. - DOI - PubMed
    1. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:366–378. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa052049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Surgeons Committee on Trauma—American College of Surgeons . Resources for optimal care of the injured patient. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 1998.
    1. Henry MC, Alicandro JM, Hollander JE, Moldashel JG, Cassara G, Thode HC., Jr Evaluation of American College of Surgeons trauma triage criteria in a suburban and rural setting. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14:124–129. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90117-5. - DOI - PubMed