Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov;46(4):827-50.
doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0074.

What explains the rural-urban gap in infant mortality: household or community characteristics?

Affiliations

What explains the rural-urban gap in infant mortality: household or community characteristics?

Ellen Van de Poel et al. Demography. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

The rural-urban gap in infant mortality rates is explained by using a new decomposition method that permits identification of the contribution of unobserved heterogeneity at the household and the community level. Using Demographic and Health Survey data for six Francophone countries in Central and West sub-Saharan Africa, we find that differences in the distributions of factors that determine mortality--not differences in their effects--explain almost the entire gap. Higher infant mortality rates in rural areas mainly derive from the rural disadvantage in household characteristics, both observed and unobserved, which explain two-thirds of the gap. Among the observed characteristics, environmental factors--a safe source of drinking water, electricity, and quality of housing materials--are the most important contributors. Community characteristics explain less than one-quarter of the gap, with about two-thirds of this coming from community unobserved heterogeneity and one-third from the existence of a health facility within the community. The effect of disadvantageous environmental conditions--such as limited electricity and water supply--derives both from a lack of community-level infrastructure and from the inability of some households to exploit it when available. Policy needs to operate at both the community and household levels to correct such deficiencies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Infant Mortality in Study Countries Compared With Others in Sub-Saharan Africa Note: For countries in the lightest shade, no data were available. Source: Demographic and Health Survey StatMapper.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Percentage Contribution of Each Covariate to the Rural-Urban Gap in Infant Mortality in the Pooled Sample

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bhargava A. “Family Planning, Gender Differences and Infant Mortality: Evidence From Uttar Pradesh, India”. Journal of Econometrics. 2003;112:225–40.
    1. Birdsall N, Chester LA. “Contraception and the Status of Women: What Is the Link?”. Family Planning Perspectives. 1987;19(1):14–18. - PubMed
    1. Blinder AS. “Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates”. Journal of Human Resources. 1973;8:436–55.
    1. Bolstad WM, Manda SO. “Investigating Child Mortality in Malawi Using Family and Community Random Effects”. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2001;96:12–19.
    1. Brenneman A. Infrastructure & Poverty Linkages: A Literature Review. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2002.

Publication types

MeSH terms