Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jan;21(1):52-65.
doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.1.7.

An attempt to improve bilateral cochlear implants by increasing the distance between electrodes and providing complementary information to the two ears

Richard S Tyler  1 , Shelley A Witt, Camille C Dunn, Ann Perreau, Aaron J Parkinson, Blake S Wilson
Affiliations
Comparative Study

An attempt to improve bilateral cochlear implants by increasing the distance between electrodes and providing complementary information to the two ears

Richard S Tyler et al. J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this investigation was to determine if adult bilateral cochlear implant recipients could benefit from using a speech processing strategy in which the input spectrum was interleaved among electrodes across the two implants.

Design: Two separate experiments were conducted. In both experiments, subjects were tested using a control speech processing strategy and a strategy in which the full input spectrum was filtered so that only the output of half of the filters was audible to one implant, while the output of the alternative filters was audible to the other implant. The filters were interleaved in a way that created alternate frequency "holes" between the two cochlear implants.

Results: In experiment one, four subjects were tested on consonant recognition. Results indicated that one of the four subjects performed better with the interleaved strategy, one subject received a binaural advantage with the interleaved strategy that they did not receive with the control strategy, and two subjects showed no decrement in performance when using the interleaved strategy. In the second experiment, 11 subjects were tested on word recognition, sentences in noise, and localization (it should be noted that not all subjects participated in all tests). Results showed that for speech perception testing one subject achieved significantly better scores with the interleaved strategy on all tests, and seven subjects showed a significant improvement with the interleaved strategy on at least one test. Only one subject showed a decrement in performance on all speech perception tests with the interleaved strategy. Out of nine subjects, one subject preferred the sound quality of the interleaved strategy. No one performed better on localization with the interleaved strategy.

Conclusion: Data from this study indicate that some adult bilateral cochlear implant recipients can benefit from using a speech processing strategy in which the input spectrum is interleaved among electrodes across the two implants. It is possible that the subjects in this study who showed a significant improvement with the interleaved strategy did so because of less channel interaction; however, this hypothesis was not directly tested.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

In the interest of full disclosure, it should be noted that author A.J.P. is employed by, but has no other financial interest in, Cochlear Americas of Denver, CO, and that author B.S.W. is a consultant to, but has no other financial interest in, MED-EL Medical Electronics GmbH of Innsbruck, Austria.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consonant identification in quiet with the speech from the front for each of four subjects (Figure 1a = subject 12422b, Figure 1b = subject 12435b, Figure 1c = subject 12452b, and Figure 1d = subject 12454b) tested in experiment 1. Shown are scores for left ear–only, right ear–only, and bilaterally for each set of conditions. On the left side of each panel are results for the spatially interleaved conditions, and on the right side of each panel are results for the control conditions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Word recognition in quiet with the speech from the front for subjects tested in experiment 2. Shown are bilateral scores for each condition.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sentence recognition in noise presented from the front (0° azimuth) for subjects tested in experiment 2. Shown are bilateral scores for each condition.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sentence recognition in noise presented from the right (90° azimuth) for subjects tested in experiment 2. Shown are bilateral scores for each condition.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Sentence recognition in noise presented from the left (90° azimuth) for subjects tested in experiment 2. Shown are bilateral scores for each condition.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Subjective quality ratings for subjects in experiment 2. Shown are bilateral scores for each condition.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Eight-speaker everyday sounds localization testing for subjects in experiment 2. Shown are bilateral scores for each condition.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Boëx C, de Balthasar C, Kós MI, Pelizzone M. Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;114(4):2049–2057. - PubMed
    1. Boothroyd A, Hanin L, Hnath T. A Sentence Test of Speech Perception: Reliability, Set Equivalence, and Short-Term Learning. New York: Speech and Hearing Sciences Research Center, City University of New York; 1985.
    1. Buss E, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA, et al. Multicenter U.S. bilateral MED-EL cochlear implantation study: speech perception over the first year of use. Ear Hear. 2008;29(1):20–32. - PubMed
    1. Byrne D. Clinical issues and options in binaural hearing aid fitting. Ear Hear. 1981;2(5):187–193. - PubMed
    1. Byrne D, Noble W. Optimizing sound localization with hearing aids. Trends Amplif. 1998;3(2):51–73. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types