Control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in planktonic form and biofilms: a biocidal efficacy study of nonthermal dielectric-barrier discharge plasma
- PMID: 20085853
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.11.002
Control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in planktonic form and biofilms: a biocidal efficacy study of nonthermal dielectric-barrier discharge plasma
Abstract
Background: Bacterial contamination of surfaces with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a serious problem in the hospital environment and is responsible for significant nosocomial infections. The pathogenic contaminants form biofilms, which are difficult to treat with routine biocides. Thus, a continuous search for novel disinfection methods is essential for effective infection control measures. This demonstration of a novel technique for the control of virulent pathogens in planktonic form as well as in established biofilms may provide a progressive alternative to standard methodology.
Methods: We evaluated a novel technique of normal atmospheric nonthermal plasma known as floating-electrode dielectric-barrier discharge (FE-DBD) plasma against a control of planktonic and biofilm forms of Escherichia coli, S aureus, multidrug-resistant methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) -95 (clinical isolate), -USA300, and -USA400, using widely accepted techniques such as colony count assay, LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability assay, and XTT (2,3-Bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide) assay.
Results: Exposure of free living planktonic forms of E coli, S aureus, and MRSA were rapidly inactivated by DBD plasma. Approximately 10(7) bacterial cells were completely (100%) killed, whereas 10(8) and 10(9) were reduced by approximately 90% to 95% and 40% to 45%, respectively, in less than 60 seconds (7.8 J/cm(2)) and completely disinfected in < or =120 seconds. In established biofilms, the susceptibility of MRSA USA400 was comparable with USA300 but less susceptible than MRSA95 (clinical isolate), S aureus, and E coli (P < .05) to FE-DBD plasma, and plasma was able to kill MRSA more than 60% within 15 seconds (1.95 J/cm(2)). The killing responses were plasma exposure-time dependent, and cell density dependent. The plasma was able disinfect surfaces in a less than 120 seconds.
Conclusion: Application of DBD plasma can be a valuable decontamination technique for the removal of planktonic and biofilm-embedded bacteria such as MRSA -USA 300, -USA 400, methicillin-sensitive S aureus (MSSA), and E coli, the more common hospital contaminants. Of interest, E coli was more resistant than S aureus phenotypes.
Copyright (c) 2010 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Disinfection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms using a remote non-thermal gas plasma.J Hosp Infect. 2011 Jul;78(3):204-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.03.019. Epub 2011 May 23. J Hosp Infect. 2011. PMID: 21601949
-
Reduction in infection risk through treatment of microbially contaminated surfaces with a novel, portable, saturated steam vapor disinfection system.Am J Infect Control. 2009 Feb;37(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.008. Epub 2008 Oct 3. Am J Infect Control. 2009. PMID: 18834748
-
Effects of colistin on biofilm matrices of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017 Apr;49(4):472-479. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Mar 4. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017. PMID: 28267594
-
[Model systems for bacterial biofilm research].Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao. 2007 Jun;47(3):558-61. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao. 2007. PMID: 17672327 Review. Chinese.
-
Surface-attached cells, biofilms and biocide susceptibility: implications for hospital cleaning and disinfection.J Hosp Infect. 2015 Jan;89(1):16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Oct 2. J Hosp Infect. 2015. PMID: 25447198 Review.
Cited by
-
Physical Approaches to Prevent and Treat Bacterial Biofilm.Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Dec 29;12(1):54. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12010054. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36671255 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nonthermal dielectric-barrier discharge plasma-induced inactivation involves oxidative DNA damage and membrane lipid peroxidation in Escherichia coli.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Mar;55(3):1053-62. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01002-10. Epub 2011 Jan 3. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011. PMID: 21199923 Free PMC article.
-
Cold Atmospheric Plasma: methods of production and application in dentistry and oncology.Med Gas Res. 2013 Oct 1;3(1):21. doi: 10.1186/2045-9912-3-21. Med Gas Res. 2013. PMID: 24083477 Free PMC article.
-
Cold Plasma Inactivation of Bacterial Biofilms and Reduction of Quorum Sensing Regulated Virulence Factors.PLoS One. 2015 Sep 21;10(9):e0138209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138209. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26390435 Free PMC article.
-
Membrane Oxidation in Cell Delivery and Cell Killing Applications.ACS Chem Biol. 2017 May 19;12(5):1170-1182. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00237. Epub 2017 Apr 10. ACS Chem Biol. 2017. PMID: 28355059 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous