Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan 19:340:c112.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.c112.

The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

R L Morton  1 , A Tong, K Howard, P Snelling, A C Webster
Affiliations

The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

R L Morton et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To synthesise the views of patients and carers in decision making regarding treatment for chronic kidney disease, and to determine which factors influence those decisions.

Design: Systematic review of qualitative studies of decision making and choice for dialysis, transplantation, or palliative care, and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Data sources: Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, social work abstracts, and digital theses (database inception to week 3 October 2008) to identify literature using qualitative methods (focus groups, interviews, or case studies). Review methods Thematic synthesis involved line by line coding of the findings of the primary studies and development of descriptive and analytical themes.

Results: 18 studies that reported the experiences of 375 patients and 87 carers were included. 14 studies focused on preferences for dialysis modality, three on transplantation, and one on palliative management. Four major themes were identified as being central to treatment choices: confronting mortality (choosing life or death, being a burden, living in limbo), lack of choice (medical decision, lack of information, constraints on resources), gaining knowledge of options (peer influence, timing of information), and weighing alternatives (maintaining lifestyle, family influences, maintaining the status quo).

Conclusions: The experiences of other patients greatly influenced the decision making of patients and carers. The problematic timing of information about treatment options and synchronous creation of vascular access seemed to predetermine haemodialysis and inhibit choice of other treatments, including palliative care. A preference to maintain the status quo may explain why patients often remain on their initial therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

None
Fig 1 Results of search strategy and identification of publications included in review
None
Fig 2 Components of each theme identified as influencing treatment decisions
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hornberger JC, Habraken H, Bloch DA. Minimum data needed on patient preferences for accurate efficient medical decision making. Med Care 1995;33:297-310. - PubMed
    1. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE. Expanding patient involvement in care: effect on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med 1985;102:520-8. - PubMed
    1. Roter DL, Hall JA. Studies of doctor-patient interaction. Annu Rev Public Health 1989;10:163-80. - PubMed
    1. Ansell D, Feehally J, Feest TG, Tomson C, Williams AJ, Warwick G. New adult patients starting renal replacement therapy in the UK in 2006. In: UK Renal Registry, ed. UK Renal Association, 2007:17-47.
    1. Mehrotra R, Marsh D, Vonesh E, Peters V, Nissenson A. Patient education and access of ESRD patients to renal replacement therapies beyond in-center hemodialysis. Kidney Int 2005;68:378-90. - PubMed

Publication types