Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jan;19(1):77-86.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1410.

Satisfaction with care among low-income women with breast cancer

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Satisfaction with care among low-income women with breast cancer

Amardeep Thind et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction is an important outcome measure in determining quality of care. There are few data evaluating patient satisfaction in nonwhite, low-income populations. The objective of this study was to identify the structure, process, and outcome factors that impact patient satisfaction with care in a low-income population of women with breast cancer.

Methods: In a cross-sectional survey of low-income women newly diagnosed with breast cancer, eligible women enrolled in the California Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program (BCCTP) from February 2003 through September 2005 were interviewed by phone 6 months after their enrollment. This was a population-based sample of women aged >or=18 years (n = 924) with a definitive diagnosis of breast cancer and enrolled in the BCCTP. The main outcome measure was satisfaction with care received.

Results: Random effects logistic regression revealed that less acculturated Latinas were more likely (odds ratio, [OR] = 5.36, p < 0.000) to be extremely satisfied with their care compared with non-Hispanic white women. Women who believed they could have been diagnosed sooner were less likely to be extremely satisfied (OR = 0.61, p < 0.000). Women who had received or were receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy had nearly twice the odds of being extremely satisfied (OR = 2.02, p < 0.000, and OR = 2.13, p < 0.000, respectively). Greater information giving was associated with greater satisfaction (OR = 1.17, p < 0.000). Women reporting greater physician emotional support were more likely to report being extremely satisfied (OR = 1.26, p < 0.000). A higher participatory treatment decision-making score was associated with greater satisfaction (OR = 1.78, p < 0.000).

Conclusions: In a low-income population, satisfaction is also reported at high levels. In addition to age, ethnicity/acculturation, receipt of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, physician emotional support, and collaborative decision making, perception of diagnostic delay is a predictor of dissatisfaction in this population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Model of patient-reported satisfaction 6 months after definitive surgery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts & figures: 2007–2008. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2007.
    1. Mandelblatt J. Armetta C. Yabroff KR. Liang W. Lawrence W. Descriptive review of the literature on breast cancer outcomes: 1990 through 2000. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2004;33:8–44. - PubMed
    1. Hawkes N. How do we get the measure of patient care? BMJ. 2008;336:249. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borders TF. Warner RD. Sutkin G. Satisfaction with health care and cancer screening practices among women in a largely rural region of West Texas. Prev Med. 2003;36:652–658. - PubMed
    1. Rosenthal GE. Shannon SE. The use of patient perceptions in the evaluation of health-care delivery systems. Med Care. 1997;35(Suppl 11):NS58–68. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms