Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Feb;10(2):201-13.
doi: 10.1517/14712590903448158.

RNA interference-based therapeutics for human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 treatment: synthetic siRNA or vector-based shRNA?

Affiliations
Review

RNA interference-based therapeutics for human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 treatment: synthetic siRNA or vector-based shRNA?

Sandesh Subramanya et al. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Importance of the field: Despite the clinical benefits of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), the prospect of life-long antiretroviral treatment poses significant problems, which has spurred interest in developing new drugs and strategies to treat HIV infection and eliminate persistent viral reservoirs. RNAi has emerged as a therapeutic possibility for HIV.

Areas covered in this review: We discuss progress in overcoming hurdles to translating transient and stable RNAi enabling technologies to clinical application for HIV; covering the past 2 - 3 years.

What the reader will gain: HIV inhibition can be achieved by transfection of chemically or enzymatically synthesized siRNAs or by DNA-based vector systems expressing short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) that are processed intracellularly into siRNA. We compare these approaches, focusing on technical and safety issues that will guide the choice of strategy for clinical use.

Take home message: Introduction of synthetic siRNA into cells or its stable endogenous production using vector-driven shRNA have been shown to suppress HIV replication in vitro and, in some instances, in vivo. Each method has advantages and limitations in terms of ease of delivery, duration of silencing, emergence of escape mutants and potential toxicity. Both appear to have potential as future therapeutics for HIV, once the technical and safety issues of each approach are overcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Promising strategies for using si/shRNA for HIV infection
The most favored method for expressing shRNA is infection with self inactivating lentiviral particles (generated using transfection with a three-plasmid system (shRNA expression cassette, packaging construct and an envelope construct). After infection, the shRNA expression cassette integrates in the cell’s genome leading to long-term production of shRNA that is processed in the cytoplasm into siRNA. The most promising targeted siRNA delivery strategy consists of a targeting and a cargo moiety. Examples include gp120 Fab-protamine, CD7ScFv-9R protein and siRNA-encapsulated immunoliposome coated with LFA-1 antibody. After delivery, the targeting complex is endocytosed and siRNA released from the endosome is taken up by RISC to mediate gene silencing.
Figure 2
Figure 2. si/shRNA design to enhance potency and reduce toxicity
Short and long siRNA triggers and chemical modifications of siRNA are depicted on the left. Strategies for conventional shRNA, shRNAmiRs and conditional shRNA expression are depicted on the right

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rossi JJ, June CH, Kohn DB. Genetic therapies against HIV. Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Dec;25(12):1444–1454. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scherer L, Rossi JJ, Weinberg MS. Progress and prospects: RNA-based therapies for treatment of HIV infection. Gene Ther. 2007 Jul;14(14):1057–1064. - PubMed
    1. Anderson J, Li MJ, Palmer B, Remling L, Li S, Yam P, et al. Safety and efficacy of a lentiviral vector containing three anti-HIV genes--CCR5 ribozyme, tat-rev siRNA, and TAR decoy--in SCID-hu mouse-derived T cells. Mol Ther. 2007 Jun;15(6):1182–1188. - PubMed
    1. Manjunath N, Kumar P, Lee SK, Shankar P. Interfering antiviral immunity: application, subversion, hope? Trends Immunol. 2006 Jul;27(7):328–335. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shankar P, Manjunath N, Lieberman J. The prospect of silencing disease using RNA interference. JAMA. 2005 Mar 16;293(11):1367–1373. - PubMed

Substances