Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
- PMID: 20089283
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.043
Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
Abstract
Purpose: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is widely used to confirm the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The technique has been associated with significant morbidity in a small proportion of patients.
Materials and methods: We conducted a population based study of 75,190 men who underwent a transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in Ontario, Canada, between 1996 and 2005. We used hospital and cancer registry administrative databases to estimate the rates of hospital admission and mortality due to urological complications associated with the procedure.
Results: Of the 75,190 men who underwent transrectal ultrasound biopsy 33,508 (44.6%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 41,682 (55.4%) did not have prostate cancer. The hospital admission rate for urological complications within 30 days of the procedure for men without cancer was 1.9% (781/41,482). The 30-day hospital admission rate increased from 1.0% in 1996 to 4.1% in 2005 (p for trend <0.0001). The majority of hospital admissions (72%) were for infection related reasons. The probability of being admitted to hospital within 30 days of having the procedure increased 4-fold between 1996 and 2005 (OR 3.7, 95% CI 2.0-7.0, p <0.0001). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 0.09% but did not change during the study period.
Conclusions: The hospital admission rates for complications following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy have increased dramatically during the last 10 years primarily due to an increasing rate of infection related complications.
2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Prostate biopsy: a risk-benefit analysis.J Urol. 2010 Mar;183(3):852-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.063. Epub 2010 Jan 20. J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20089273 No abstract available.
-
Editorial comment.J Urol. 2010 Mar;183(3):969. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.118. Epub 2010 Jan 20. J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20089275 No abstract available.
-
Editorial comment.J Urol. 2010 Mar;183(3):968-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.117. Epub 2010 Jan 20. J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20089282 No abstract available.
-
Re: increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: R. K. Nam, R. Saskin, Y. Lee, Y. Liu, C. Law, L. H. Klotz, D. A. Loblaw, J. Trachtenberg, A. Stanimirovic, A. E. Simor, A. Seth, D. R. Urbach and S. A. Narod J Urol 2010; 183: 963-969.J Urol. 2010 Nov;184(5):2216-7; author reply 2217. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.121. Epub 2010 Sep 22. J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20864132 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
