Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness
- PMID: 20090532
- DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181cb41aa
Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness
Abstract
Objective: The Neural Response Telemetry (NRT) recovery function measures the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in response to a second biphasic pulse (the probe) after masking by a first pulse (the masker). The masker-probe interval is varied and the ECAP amplitude is measured at each masker-probe interval, giving an inverse exponential recovery. The prevailing understanding of the recovery function has been that faster recovery indicates a more efficient response to the individual pulses within a pulse sequence. Psychophysical data in the past have not supported this view, and in fact, the opposite result has been observed. This study explores this phenomenon from theoretical and experimental viewpoints. Fundamentally, a distinction is made between the refractoriness of a single fiber and the refractoriness of the whole nerve. The hypothesis is that the size of the neural population heavily influences whole nerve refractoriness: large neural populations operate near threshold and are more susceptible to masking, leading to slower ECAP recovery; however, they maintain temporal responsiveness through greater numbers of nonrefractory neurons.
Design: In phase I, the hearing loss durations (indicators of neural survival) of 21 adult Nucleus Freedom implantees were compared with the corresponding median recovery function time-constants (calculated per implant array). The data were separated by implant (nine Contour, 12 Straight) and the means of these two groups were compared. The Straight array, delivering broader excitation, is expected to engage a larger neural population. In phase II, a computational model of the ECAP recovery function was constructed based on data from the cat auditory nerve. The model allows the neural population size to be manipulated; accordingly, recovery functions from different neural populations were compared. In phase III, ECAP thresholds (via AutoNRT), ECAP recovery functions, and T- and C-levels were obtained from a subset of 12 subjects. Psychophysical levels were measured using pulse train stimuli at six different stimulation rates, spanning 250 to 3500 Hz. At each electrode, the recovery function time-constant tau was compared with two measures of temporal responsiveness: (i) the gradient of the linear trend in psychophysical levels with stimulation rate; and (ii) the difference between ECAP threshold (a single pulse measure) and 900 Hz T-level (a pulse train measure).
Results: In phase I, a trend toward shorter recovery function time-constants with increasing hearing loss durations was observed. The mean recovery function time-constant of the Contour implant group (0.51 msec) was significantly shorter than that of the Straight implant group (0.90 msec). When, in phase II, the recovery functions from the computational model were compared at equal ECAP amplitude, the larger neural population was associated with slower ECAP recovery. In phase III, the recovery function time-constant was significantly correlated with both temporal responsiveness measures, with slower ECAP, recovery associated with greater temporal responsiveness, thus confirming the results of previous studies.
Conclusions: : Slower ECAP recovery, at equal loudness, is associated with larger neural populations. The collective results suggest that this neural population view of the recovery function explains the observed association between slower ECAP recovery and greater temporal responsiveness.
Similar articles
-
Neural response telemetry reconsidered: I. The relevance of ECAP threshold profiles and scaled profiles to cochlear implant fitting.Ear Hear. 2010 Jun;31(3):367-79. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c9fd86. Ear Hear. 2010. PMID: 20124902
-
Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration.Hear Res. 2009 Jan;247(2):112-21. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.002. Epub 2008 Nov 27. Hear Res. 2009. PMID: 19068227
-
Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Dec;115(12):2811-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.06.024. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004. PMID: 15546789
-
A different approach to using neural response telemetry for automated cochlear implant processor programming.Ear Hear. 2005 Aug;26(4 Suppl):38S-44S. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200508001-00006. Ear Hear. 2005. PMID: 16082266 Review.
-
The Role of Auditory Evoked Potentials in the Context of Cochlear Implant Provision.Otol Neurotol. 2017 Dec;38(10):e522-e530. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001480. Otol Neurotol. 2017. PMID: 29135872 Review.
Cited by
-
Intraoperative Neural Response Telemetry and Neural Recovery Function: a Comparative Study between Adults and Children.Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Jan;19(1):10-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1372509. Epub 2014 Apr 2. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015. PMID: 25992145 Free PMC article.
-
The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.Hear Res. 2014 Oct;316:44-56. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Aug 2. Hear Res. 2014. PMID: 25093283 Free PMC article.
-
The Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential: From Laboratory to Clinic.Front Neurosci. 2017 Jun 23;11:339. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00339. eCollection 2017. Front Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28690494 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Electrically evoked compound action potential polarity sensitivity, refractory-recovery, and behavioral multi-pulse integration as potential indices of neural health in cochlear-implant recipients.Hear Res. 2023 Jun;433:108764. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108764. Epub 2023 Apr 11. Hear Res. 2023. PMID: 37062161 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The Electrically Evoked Auditory Change Complex Evoked by Temporal Gaps Using Cochlear Implants or Auditory Brainstem Implants in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.Ear Hear. 2018 May/Jun;39(3):482-494. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000498. Ear Hear. 2018. PMID: 28968281 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous