Touch preparation cytology of breast lumpectomy margins with histologic correlation
- PMID: 2009065
- DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410280094014
Touch preparation cytology of breast lumpectomy margins with histologic correlation
Erratum in
- Arch Surg 1991 Dec;126(12):1542
Abstract
Residual microscopic disease after lumpectomy for breast cancer may cause significant local recurrence. We evaluated one hundred fourteen consecutive breast lumpectomy margins in this study by touch preparation cytology. Cytologic preparations were intraoperatively correlated with gross and frozen section results and subsequently with permanent histologic sections of representative margins. Three specimens were cytologically unsatisfactory and 86 yielded benign findings, while material suggestive or diagnostic of malignancy was obtained from 25 specimens. Gross, frozen section, and permanent histologic margins were positive in 10, 17, and 22 cases, respectively. There were three false-positive touch preparation cytologic results, while frozen section specimens were false-negative in five cases. Sensitivity and specificity of touch preparation cytology were 100% and 96.6%, respectively, with a diagnostic accuracy of 97.3%. Touch preparation cytologic examination rapidly and reliably evaluates lumpectomy margins and overcomes sampling errors and artifacts related to frozen section evaluation. This technique currently complements frozen section evaluation of lumpectomy margins as part of a protocol aimed at reducing local recurrence of breast cancer.
Similar articles
-
Cytology of lumpectomy specimens.Acta Cytol. 1991 Jul-Aug;35(4):417-21. Acta Cytol. 1991. PMID: 1718113
-
Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar;14(3):1045-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9263-x. Epub 2007 Jan 6. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17206481
-
Determinants of positive histologic margins and residual tumor after lumpectomy for early breast cancer: a prospective study with special reference to touch preparation cytology.J Surg Oncol. 1997 Dec;66(4):248-53. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199712)66:4<248::aid-jso5>3.0.co;2-b. J Surg Oncol. 1997. PMID: 9425328 Clinical Trial.
-
Local recurrence in lumpectomy patients after imprint cytology margin evaluation.Am J Surg. 2004 Oct;188(4):349-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.024. Am J Surg. 2004. PMID: 15474425 Review.
-
Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?Breast. 2013 Aug;22 Suppl 2:S115-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.022. Breast. 2013. PMID: 24074771 Review.
Cited by
-
Histopathological Study on Conservatively Operated Breast Carcinomas.Curr Health Sci J. 2016 Jul-Sep;42(3):269-282. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.42.03.07. Epub 2016 Sep 29. Curr Health Sci J. 2016. PMID: 30581581 Free PMC article.
-
Computerized decision support system for intraoperative analysis of margin status in breast conservation therapy.ISRN Surg. 2012;2012:546721. doi: 10.5402/2012/546721. Epub 2012 Nov 25. ISRN Surg. 2012. PMID: 23213570 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of residual cancer after diagnostic breast biopsy: an argument for fine-needle aspiration cytology.Ann Surg Oncol. 1995 May;2(3):201-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02307024. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995. PMID: 7641015
-
Accuracy of gross intraoperative margin assessment for breast cancer: experience since the SSO-ASTRO margin consensus guidelines.Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 15;10(1):17344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74373-6. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 33060797 Free PMC article.
-
Usefulness of intraoperative touch smear cytology in breast-conserving surgery.Exp Ther Med. 2010 Jul;1(4):641-645. doi: 10.3892/etm_00000100. Epub 2010 Jul 1. Exp Ther Med. 2010. PMID: 22993587 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical