Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 May;59(5):779-87.
doi: 10.1007/s00262-009-0798-0. Epub 2009 Nov 29.

Comparison of AAV/IL-7 autocrine (T cell) versus paracrine (DC) gene delivery for enhancing CTL stimulation and function

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of AAV/IL-7 autocrine (T cell) versus paracrine (DC) gene delivery for enhancing CTL stimulation and function

Chang-Xuan You et al. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2010 May.

Abstract

Adoptive transfer of antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) into patients holds promise in treating cancer. Such anti-cancer CTL are stimulated by professional antigen-presenting dendritic cells (DC). We hypothesize the gene delivery of various Th1-response cytokines, such as interleukin 7 (IL-7), should further enhance CTL stimulation and activity. However, the issue as to which cell type, DC (paracrine) or the T cell (autocrine), should express a particular Th1 cytokine gene for optimal CTL stimulation has never been addressed. We used adeno-associated virus-2 (AAV) to compare delivery of IL-7 and IL-2 genes into DC or T cells and to exogenous commercial cytokines for generating robust carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-specific CTL. AAV/IL-7 transduction of T cells (autocrine delivery) generated CTL with the highest killing capability. Consistent with this, AAV/IL-7 delivery generated T cell populations with the highest proliferation, highest interferon gamma expression, highest CD8(+):CD4(+) ratio, highest CD8(+), CD69(+) levels, and lowest CD4(+), CD25(+) (Treg) levels. These data are consistent with higher killing by the AAV/IL-7-altered CTL. These data strongly suggest that IL-7 autocrine gene delivery is optimal for CTL generation. These data also suggest Th1 cytokine autocrine versus paracrine delivery is an important issue for immuno-gene therapy and uncovers new questions into cytokine mechanism of action.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Structure of the cell treatment protocol. This figure shows the temporal treatment of the Mo/DC and T cells and is self-descriptive. However, note that AAV/cytokine vectors are used to infect Mo/DC at day zero, or naive T cells just prior to co-incubation with AAV/antigen-loaded DC on day 5
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Secretion of IL-2 and IL-7 in AAV-transduced cells over time. a Secretion of of IL-2 from transduced DC by ELISA assay. b Secretion of IL-7 from transduced DC by ELISA assay. c Secretion of of IL-2 from transduced T cells by ELISA assay. d Secretion of of IL-7 from transduced T cells by ELISA assay
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Analysis of IL-12 and IL-10 expression by DC and IFNγ expression by T cells under various treatments. a Analysis of IL-12 and IL-10 expression in DC under various treatments as indicated by intracellular staining. b Percentage of T cells which express IFNγ, after indicated DC (paracrine) treatment, as determined by intracellular staining. c Percentage of T cells which express IFNγ, after indicated T cell (autocrine) treatment, as determined by intracellular staining. d Proliferation of T cells resulting from indicated treatments
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Enhanced CTL killing, and antigen specific killing, by IL-7 autocrine delivery. a CTL killing after the indicated treatment, of CEA-positive targets, by standard 51Cr release assay. All assays were done at a effector:target ratio of 20:1. Note that AAV/IL-7 autocrine delivery resulted in CTL with the highest killing ability. b The key for section C. c CEA-specific CTL were tested for the ability to kill a variety of cellular targets by standard 51Cr release assay. All assays were done at a effector:target ratio of 20:1. Note that only the CEA-positive SW480 cell line was killed at a significant level

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Steinman RA. The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity. Ann Rev Imm. 1991;9:271–296. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.09.040191.001415. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A. Efficient presentation of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus interleukin 4 and downregulated by tumor necrosis factor alpha. J Exp Med. 1994;179:1109–1118. doi: 10.1084/jem.179.4.1109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Romani N, Gruner S, Brang D, Kampgen E, Lenz A, Trockenbacher B, Konwalinka G, Fritsch PO, Steinman RM, Schuker G. Proliferating dendritic cell progenitors in human blood. J Exp Med. 1994;180:83–93. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.1.83. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Young JW, Inaba K. Dendritic cells as adjuvants for class I major histocompatibility complex-restricted antitumor immunity. J Exp Med. 1994;183:7–11. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.1.7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zivotgel L, Mayordomo JI, Tjandrawan T, DeLao AB, Clarke MR, Lotze MT, Storkus WJ. Therapy of murine tumors with tumor peptide-pulsed dendritic cells: dependence on T cells, B7 costimulationm and T helper cell I-associated cytokines. J Exp Med. 1996;183:87–97. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.1.87. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types