Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2010 Feb;115(2 Pt 2):414-417.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bd8a61.

Rupture of the posterior cul-de-sac during spontaneous labor

Brett Young  1 , Tamara Takoudes, Kee-Hak Lim, Sarosh Rana
Affiliations
Case Reports

Rupture of the posterior cul-de-sac during spontaneous labor

Brett Young et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Women with genital anomalies are at increased risk of labor dysfunction. Rupture of the posterior cul-de-sac causing an intraabdominal delivery is a rare complication of labor that may be related to a congenitally atretic vagina.

Case: A nulliparous woman at 28 weeks of gestation with a known short vagina presented with preterm labor; her cervix could not be palpated or visualized. At cesarean delivery, the cervix was intraabdominal and the fetal head was delivered in the abdomen. A large rent in the posterior cul-de-sac required repair to restore correct anatomical positioning. The uterus was intact.

Conclusion: Rupture of the posterior cul-de-sac is a rare event that can cause significant maternal and fetal morbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cetinkaya M, Kokcu A, Alper T. The rupture through posterior vaginal fornix of the posterior lower uterine segment. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;16:295–6.
    1. Jeffcoate TN, Lister UM. Annular detachment of the cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1952;59:327–35.
    1. Fox R, Holmes R, James M, Tuohy J, Wardle P. Serial transvaginal ultrasonography following McDonald cerclage and repeat suture insertion. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;38:27–30.
    1. Nahum GG. Uterine anomalies. How common are they, and what is their distribution among subtypes? J Reprod Med 1998;43:877–87.
    1. Walsh CA, Baxi LV. Rupture of the primigravid uterus: a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2007;62:327–34.

Publication types