Abdominal wall abscess presenting 35 years after insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device
- PMID: 20093879
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bb2554
Abdominal wall abscess presenting 35 years after insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device
Abstract
Background: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are an effective means of contraception for many women worldwide. However, complications of insertion, such as uterine perforation, can lead to significant intraabdominal problems. We present a case of an abdominal wall abscess caused by an IUD 35 years after insertion.
Case: A 52-year-old woman who had had an IUD placed approximately 35 years previously presented to our institution with fever and a left-lower-quadrant mass. A computed tomography scan demonstrated a foreign body consistent with an extrauterine IUD located within a multiloculated anterior abdominal wall fluid collection. An exploratory laparotomy confirmed that the abscess cavity involved the rectus musculature and contained the migrated IUD.
Conclusion: This case demonstrates an unusual location for a migrated IUD. It also argues for removal of a migrated or "lost" IUD to prevent future complications.
Similar articles
-
Rectal Perforation by an Intrauterine Device Leading to Fatal Intra-Abdominal Sepsis and Necrotizing Fasciitis.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Jun;43(6):760-762. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Sep 30. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021. PMID: 33268310
-
Surgical removal of an intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon: a case report.Int J Surg. 2008 Dec;6(6):e60-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.02.006. Epub 2007 Feb 27. Int J Surg. 2008. PMID: 17409036
-
A lost intrauterine device. Guess where we found it and how it happened?Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2006 Mar;11(1):47-9. doi: 10.1080/13625180500456791. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2006. PMID: 16546816
-
Migration of intrauterine devices: radiologic findings and implications for patient care.Radiographics. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):335-52. doi: 10.1148/rg.322115068. Radiographics. 2012. PMID: 22411936 Review.
-
Ileal penetration by a Multiload-Cu 375 intrauterine contraceptive device. A case report with review of the literature.Contraception. 1998 Nov;58(5):295-304. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00116-4. Contraception. 1998. PMID: 9883385 Review.
Cited by
-
Migrated intrauterine device presented as anterior abdominal wall abscess.J Surg Case Rep. 2019 Jun 14;2019(6):rjz174. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjz174. eCollection 2019 Jun. J Surg Case Rep. 2019. PMID: 31214315 Free PMC article.
-
Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives.Open Access J Contracept. 2016 Mar 16;7:19-32. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S85546. eCollection 2016. Open Access J Contracept. 2016. PMID: 29386934 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division. Levels and trends of contraceptive use as assessed in 2002. 1st ed. New York (NY): United Nations Publications; 2006.
-
- World Health Organization. Intrauterine devices: technical and managerial guidelines for services. Geneva: WHO; 1997.
-
- World Health Organization. Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices: report of a WHO scientific group. Technical Report Series 753. Geneva: WHO; 1987.
-
- Stenchever MA, Droegemueller W, Herbst AL, Mishell DR. Comprehensive gynecology. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 2001.
-
- Chen C, Hsu T, Wang W. Ileal penetration by a Multiload-Cu 375 intrauterine contraceptive device. A case report with review of the literature. Contraception 1998;58:295–304.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources