An evaluation of colonoscopy use: implications for health education
- PMID: 20094829
- DOI: 10.1007/s13187-009-0024-y
An evaluation of colonoscopy use: implications for health education
Abstract
In this retrospective study, we examined factors that associated with colonoscopy test use among adults who did not have colorectal cancer (CRC) in the USA. A total of 2,150 non-CRC adults >or=55 were selected from the Health Information National Trends Survey, a random-digit telephone survey that collected data in 2003-2004. Participants were classified based on receiving CRC tests within the recommended time interval. Socio-demographic and cognitive factors that are associated with colonoscopy test use were examined. The results show that adults 55-64 years old were less likely to have a colonoscopy compared with those 65 years and older. Participants with higher levels of knowledge, greater access to care, greater perceived risk, and lower psychological barriers were more likely to report receiving a colonoscopy. The findings indicate a continuous effort to increase awareness and risk perception, and reduce psychological barriers through health education.
Similar articles
-
Patients without colonoscopic follow-up after abnormal fecal immunochemical tests are often unaware of the abnormal result and report several barriers to colonoscopy.BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01262-7. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32306919 Free PMC article.
-
Screeners vs. Non-screeners for Colorectal Cancer among People over 50 Years of Age: Factual and Psychological Discriminants.J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2020 Oct 27;29(4):529-537. doi: 10.15403/jgld-2263. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2020. PMID: 33118538
-
Reasons for declining colorectal cancer screening by older Canadians: a pilot study.J Cancer Educ. 2008 Jan-Mar;23(1):32-6. doi: 10.1080/08858190701821188. J Cancer Educ. 2008. PMID: 18444044
-
Awareness of Stomach and Colorectal Cancer Risk Factors, Symptoms and Time Taken to Seek Medical Help Among Public Attending Primary Care Setting in Muscat Governorate, Oman.J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):423-434. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1266-8. J Cancer Educ. 2019. PMID: 28782080
-
Rural-Urban Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers in Nebraska.J Community Health. 2015 Dec;40(6):1065-74. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0032-2. J Community Health. 2015. PMID: 25910484 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Predicting Colonoscopy Screening Behavior and Future Screening Intentions for African Americans Older than 50 Years.Behav Med. 2019 Jul-Sep;45(3):221-230. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2018.1510365. Epub 2018 Nov 14. Behav Med. 2019. PMID: 30427773 Free PMC article.
-
Explaining the Correlates of the Multi-Theory Model (MTM) of Health Behavior Change in Visual (Structural) Colorectal Cancer Screening Examinations.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 12;22(1):98. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010098. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025. PMID: 39857551 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating Factors Associated with FOBT Screening for Colorectal Cancer Based on the Components of Health Belief Model and Social Support.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017 Aug 27;18(8):2163-2169. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.8.2163. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017. PMID: 28843251 Free PMC article.
-
Proguanil and atovaquone use is associated with lower colorectal cancer risk: a nationwide cohort study.BMC Med. 2022 Nov 10;20(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02643-3. BMC Med. 2022. PMID: 36357883 Free PMC article.
-
An evaluation of healthcare information on the Internet: the case of colorectal cancer prevention.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jan 14;11(1):1058-75. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110101058. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014. PMID: 24424284 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical