Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;19(2):229-37.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1393.

Barriers to cervical cancer screening among lesbians

Affiliations

Barriers to cervical cancer screening among lesbians

J Kathleen Tracy et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate cervical cancer screening practices and barriers to screening in a sample of lesbians.

Methods: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 225 self-identified lesbians who completed an online questionnaire.

Results: Of the respondents, 71% reported receiving a Pap screening test in the past 24 months (routine screeners), and 29% reported receiving a Pap screening test >24 months ago or never (nonroutine screeners). Routine screeners were more likely to be older (p < 0.01), white (p = 0.04), and college graduates (p < 0.01) than nonroutine screeners. Nonroutine screeners were more likely to delay seeking healthcare because of fear of discrimination (p < 0.01) and were less likely than routine screeners to disclose orientation to their primary care physician (p < 0.01). After adjusting for age, race, and education, nonroutine screeners perceived fewer benefits from (p < 0.01) and more barriers (p < 0.01) to Pap screening tests and were less knowledgeable about screening guidelines (p < 0.01) than routine screeners, but there was no difference in perceived susceptibility (p = 0.68), perceived seriousness (p = 0.68), or risk factor knowledge (p = 0.35) of cervical cancer.

Conclusions: Many lesbians do not screen for cervical cancer at recommended rates. Nonroutine screeners perceive fewer benefits, more barriers, and more discrimination and are less knowledgeable about screening guidelines than routine screeners.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Discrimination Due to Sexual Orientation and Disclosure of Sexual Orientation

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2009. Atlanta: ACS; 2009.
    1. Schiffman MH. Brinton LA. Devesa SS. Fraumeni JF., Jr . In: Cancer epidemiology and prevention. Schottenfeld D, editor; Fraumeni JF Jr., editor. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. pp. 1090–1116.
    1. Matthews AK. Brandenburg DL. Johnson TP. Hughes TL. Correlates of underutilization of gynecological cancer screening among lesbian and heterosexual women. Prev Med. 2004;38:105–113. - PubMed
    1. Harris Interactive. New national survey shows financial concerns and lack of adequate health insurance are top causes for delay by lesbians in obtaining health care. 2005. www.harrisinteractive.com/news/allnewsbydate.asp?NewsID = 899. www.harrisinteractive.com/news/allnewsbydate.asp?NewsID = 899
    1. Diamant AL. Schuster MA. Lever J. Receipt of preventive health care services by lesbians. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19:141–148. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms