Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;130(8):909-12.
doi: 10.3109/00016480903559731.

Do patients with sclerotic mastoids require aeration to improve success of tympanoplasty?

Affiliations

Do patients with sclerotic mastoids require aeration to improve success of tympanoplasty?

Sema Zer Toros et al. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Conclusion: We could not find any significant difference in the results for graft success rate and functional hearing results between the myringoplasty and tympano-mastoidectomy groups. So mastoidectomy may not be necessary for successful tympanic membrane reconstruction and hearing improvement.

Objective: To investigate the effect of aerating mastoidectomy on the surgical success rate of myringoplasty.

Methods: This was a retrospective study. Data were analyzed from 92 patients who underwent surgical repair of tympanic membrane perforations due to chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) without cholesteatoma. Tympano-mastoidectomy was performed in 46 patients with a small sclerotic mastoid. The other 46 patients underwent myringoplasty without mastoidectomy. Patients were evaluated for success in tympanic membrane reconstruction and hearing levels after a minimum follow-up duration of 1 year.

Results: Tympanic membrane perforation closure was successful in 76.1% (n = 35) of the 46 patients undergoing myringoplasty and in 78.3% (n = 36) of the 46 patients undergoing myringoplasty with mastoidectomy. The difference between the closure rates of the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The difference between the two groups for hearing gain was also not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources