Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar 30;99(4):538-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.01.008. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

Sex-based differences in the behavioral and neuronal responses to food

Affiliations

Sex-based differences in the behavioral and neuronal responses to food

Marc-Andre Cornier et al. Physiol Behav. .

Abstract

Sex-based differences in food intake related behaviors have been observed previously. The objective of this study was to examine sex-based differences in the behavioral and neuronal responses to food. 22 women and 21 men were studied. After 6 days of controlled eucaloric feeding, ad libitum energy intake (EI) was measured for 3 days. Appetite ratings using visual analog scales were obtained before and after each meal. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed in the overnight fasted state on the last day of eucaloric feeding while subjects were presented visual stimuli of food and neutral non-food objects. While hunger and prospective consumption were not different between sexes, women had higher post-meal satiety ratings and dietary restraint than men. Images of hedonic foods resulted in significantly greater activation of lateral and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and parietal cortex in women as compared to men. No brain regions were more activated in men as compared to women. Men increased their EI during the ad libitum diet phase. While measures of appetite or feeding behaviors did not correlate with either neuronal activation or subsequent EI, DLPFC activation in response to hedonic foods was negatively correlated with EI. In summary, greater prefrontal neuronal responses to food cues in women may suggest increased cognitive processing related to executive function, such as planning, guidance or evaluation of behavior. Finally, increased DLPFC activation, perhaps relating to inhibitory cognitive control in response to food cues may be a better predictor of food intake than behavioral measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baskin DG, et al. Insulin and leptin: dual adiposity signals to the brain for the regulation of food intake and body weight. Brain Res. 1999;848(1–2):114–23. - PubMed
    1. Schwartz MW. Central nervous system regulation of food intake. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14(Suppl 1):1S–8S. - PubMed
    1. Berthoud HR. Mind versus metabolism in the control of food intake and energy balance. Physiol Behav. 2004;81(5):781–93. - PubMed
    1. Watts AG. Understanding the neural control of ingestive behaviors: helping to separate cause from effect with dehydration-associated anorexia. Horm Behav. 2000;37(4):261–83. - PubMed
    1. Zheng H, et al. Appetite control and energy balance regulation in the modern world: reward-driven brain overrides repletion signals. Int J Obes (Lond) 2009;33(Suppl 2):S8–13. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types