No difference in knee function or prevalence of osteoarthritis after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with 4-strand hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon-bone autograft: a randomized study with 10-year follow-up
- PMID: 20097928
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546509350301
No difference in knee function or prevalence of osteoarthritis after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with 4-strand hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon-bone autograft: a randomized study with 10-year follow-up
Abstract
Background: The choice of different graft types and surgical techniques used when reconstructing a torn anterior cruciate ligament may influence the long-term prevalence of osteoarthritis and functional outcomes.
Hypothesis: There are no differences in the prevalence of knee osteoarthritis or knee function in patients undergoing reconstruction of a torn anterior cruciate ligament with 4-strand hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon-bone autograft.
Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Methods: Seventy-two patients with subacute or chronic rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament were randomly assigned to autograft reconstruction with 4-strand gracilis and semitendinosus tendon (HAM) (N = 37) or with patellar tendon-bone (PTB) (N = 35) from the ipsilateral side. Outcome measurements were the Cincinnati knee score, single-legged hop tests, isokinetic muscle strength tests, pain, knee joint laxity test (KT-1000 arthrometer), and a radiologic evaluation (Kellgren and Lawrence) at 10-year follow-up.
Results: At 10 years, 57 patients (79%) were eligible for evaluation-29 in the HAM group and 28 in the PTB group. No differences were found between the 2 graft groups with respect to the Cincinnati knee score, the single-legged hop tests, pain, muscle strength measurements, or knee joint laxity. Fifty-five percent and 64% of the patients had osteoarthritis corresponding to Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 or more in the HAM and the PTB groups, respectively (P =.27). For the uninvolved knee, the corresponding numbers were 28% and 22% (P = .62).
Conclusion: At 10 years postoperatively, no statistically significant differences in clinical outcome between the 2 graft types were found. The prevalence of osteoarthritis was significantly higher in the operated leg than in the contralateral leg, but there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. The results indicate that the choice of graft type after an anterior cruciate ligament injury has minimal influence on the prevalence of osteoarthritis 10 years after surgery.
Similar articles
-
A prospective, randomized comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: five-year follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2006 Dec;34(12):1933-40. doi: 10.1177/0363546506290726. Epub 2006 Aug 21. Am J Sports Med. 2006. PMID: 16923826 Clinical Trial.
-
Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts. A prospective, randomized study.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Sep;84(9):1503-13. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200209000-00001. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002. PMID: 12208905 Clinical Trial.
-
Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial using similar femoral and tibial fixation methods.Am J Sports Med. 2009 Oct;37(10):1946-57. doi: 10.1177/0363546509339577. Epub 2009 Aug 14. Am J Sports Med. 2009. PMID: 19684298 Clinical Trial.
-
A meta-analysis of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee. 2015 Mar;22(2):100-10. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Dec 11. Knee. 2015. PMID: 25547048 Review.
-
Long-term results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft with a minimum follow-up of 10 years-a systematic review.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4277-4289. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04687-9. Epub 2022 Nov 28. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023. PMID: 36441213 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Risk factors of cartilage lesion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 Sep 8;10:935795. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.935795. eCollection 2022. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022. PMID: 36158222 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-term results after reconstruction of the ACL with hamstrings autograft and transtibial femoral drilling.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Sep;21(9):2004-10. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2330-x. Epub 2012 Dec 8. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013. PMID: 23223948
-
Early Accelerated versus Delayed Conservative Rehabilitation Protocol after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Trial.Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2022 Jun 30;57(3):429-436. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748970. eCollection 2022 Jun. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2022. PMID: 35785121 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of sensory deficits after harvesting hamstrings autograft for ACL reconstruction.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Apr;23(4):1060-4. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2871-2. Epub 2014 Jan 31. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015. PMID: 24482218
-
Permanent knee sensorimotor system changes following ACL injury and surgery.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 May;25(5):1461-1474. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4432-y. Epub 2017 Feb 2. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017. PMID: 28154888
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical