Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Winter;3(4):275-6.
doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0099.

In their own voices: rural African-American youth speak out about community-based HIV prevention interventions

Affiliations

In their own voices: rural African-American youth speak out about community-based HIV prevention interventions

Dionne Smith Coker-Appiah et al. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2009 Winter.

Abstract

Background: The HIV epidemic is a major public health problem in the United States, particularly among rural African American adolescents and young adults.

Objectives: We sought to explore young, rural African American’s perspectives about key programmatic components to consider when designing youth-targeted, community-based HIV prevention interventions.

Methods: We report data from four focus groups with adolescents and young adults aged 16 to 24 (n = 38) conducted as part of a community-based participatory research (CBPR) project designed to develop multilevel HIV risk reduction interventions in two rural North Carolina communities with high HIV rates. Analysis was performed by academic and community partners using a modified grounded theory approach to content analysis.

Results: Interventions should target preadolescents and early adolescents rather than older adolescents and young adults in an effort to “catch them while they’re young.” Intervention developers should obtain input from local young people regarding critical programmatic components, such as whom to employ as study recruiters and intervention leaders; intervention format and delivery options, acceptable recruitment and intervention locations, and incentive structures. Participants believe selecting community collaborators representing varied community sectors is critical. Important barriers to address included limited transportation, discomfort communicating about sexual issues, lack of community interest in HIV prevention, and unwillingness to acknowledge and address sexual activity among adolescents.

Conclusion: When designing HIV/AIDS prevention interventions, targeting young people, it is important to form academic–community partnerships that ensure young people’s perspectives are integral to the intervention development process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Census 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau; 2000.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS surveillance report, 2005. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2007.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention research synthesis. [Accessed November 22, 2008]. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/research/prs/index.htm.
    1. Lyles CM, Kay LS, Crepaz N, et al. Best-Evidence Interventions: Findings From a Systematic Review of HIV Behavioral Interventions for US Populations at High Risk, 2000–2004. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(1):133. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Southern States Manifesto Update 2008: HIV/AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Diseases in the South, July 21, 2008: Southern AIDS Coalition; July 2008.

MeSH terms