Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan 22;468(4-6):112-118.
doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.12.049.

Achieving Energy Conservation in Poisson-Boltzmann Molecular Dynamics: Accuracy and Precision with Finite-Difference Algorithms

Affiliations

Achieving Energy Conservation in Poisson-Boltzmann Molecular Dynamics: Accuracy and Precision with Finite-Difference Algorithms

Jun Wang et al. Chem Phys Lett. .

Abstract

Violation of energy conservation in Poisson-Boltzmann molecular dynamics, due to the limited accuracy and precision of numerical methods, is a major bottleneck preventing its wide adoption in biomolecular simulations. We explored the ideas of enforcing interface conditions by the immerse interface method and of removing charge singularity to improve the finite-difference methods. Our analysis of these ideas on an analytical test system shows significant improvement in both energies and forces. Our analysis further indicates the need for more accurate force calculation, especially the boundary force calculation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A single dielectric sphere with radius R=2Å. The inside dielectric is ε and outside dielectric is ε+ . A single point charge (Q=+e) is positioned d away from the center.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of errors of potential and electric field on inside grid points near the interface and those of interpolated potential and field on the interface (left). Analytical potential on the interface is shown on the right.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Convergence of numerical db forces with respect to the number of numerical surface elements (N) for the charge placed at d=1.0 Å.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Standard deviations (upper) and maximum errors (lower) of reaction field energies, qE forces, and db forces versus decreasing h.

References

    1. Davis ME, McCammon JA. Journal Of Computational Chemistry. 1990;11:401.
    1. Zauhar RJ. Journal Of Computational Chemistry. 1991;12:575.
    1. Sharp K. Journal Of Computational Chemistry. 1991;12:454.
    1. Luty BA, Davis ME, McCammon JA. Journal Of Computational Chemistry. 1992;13:768.
    1. Gilson MK, Davis ME, Luty BA, McCammon JA. Journal Of Physical Chemistry. 1993;97:3591.

LinkOut - more resources