A study on the consumer's perception of front-of-pack nutrition labeling
- PMID: 20098583
- PMCID: PMC2809237
- DOI: 10.4162/nrp.2009.3.4.300
A study on the consumer's perception of front-of-pack nutrition labeling
Abstract
The goal of this research is to investigate the present situation for front of pack labeling in Korea and the perception of consumers for the new system of labeling, front of pack labeling, based on the consumer survey. We investigated the number of processed foods with front of pack labeling in one retailer in Youngin-si. And we also surveyed 1,019 participants nationwide whose ages were from 20 to 49; the knowledge of nutrition labeling, the knowledge of 'front of pack labeling', and the opinion about the labeling system. The data were analyzed using SAS statistics program. The results were as follows: 13.4% of processed foods had front of pack labeling, and 16.8% of the consumers always checked the nutrition labeling, while 32.7% of the consumers seldom checked it. In addition, 44.3% of the consumers think that 'front of pack labeling' is necessary, and 58.3% of the consumers think it is important to show the percentage of daily value as a way of 'front of pack labeling'. However, 32% of the consumer think the possibility of 'front of pack labeling' is slim. Meanwhile, 58.3% of the consumers think that it is important to have the color difference according to contents. The number of favorite nutrients in the front of pack was four or five. It seems that the recognition of current nutrition labeling has the influence on the willingness of using the future 'front of pack labeling'. Along with our study, the policy for 'front of pack labeling' has to be updated and improved constantly since 'front of pack labeling' helps consumer understand nutrition facts.
Keywords: Nutrition labeling; back-of pack; consumer perception; front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labeling; survey.
Similar articles
-
Nutrition, hedonic or environmental? The effect of front-of-pack messages on consumers' perception and purchase intention of a novel food product with multiple attributes.Food Res Int. 2020 Apr;130:108962. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108962. Epub 2019 Dec 29. Food Res Int. 2020. PMID: 32156397
-
Impact of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchasing Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Am J Prev Med. 2016 May;50(5):627-636. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.020. Epub 2015 Dec 15. Am J Prev Med. 2016. PMID: 26699246 Clinical Trial.
-
Influence of front-of-pack labelling and regulated nutrition claims on consumers' perceptions of product healthfulness and purchase intentions: A randomized controlled trial.Appetite. 2020 Jun 1;149:104629. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104629. Epub 2020 Feb 12. Appetite. 2020. PMID: 32061707 Clinical Trial.
-
The growing role of front-of-pack nutrition profile labeling: a consumer perspective on key issues and controversies.Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55(3):291-303. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2011.653018. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015. PMID: 24915389 Review.
-
Nutrient profiling for front of pack labelling: how to align logical consumer choice with improvement of products?Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):247-254. doi: 10.1017/S0029665117000337. Proc Nutr Soc. 2017. PMID: 28857018 Review.
Cited by
-
A traffic light food labeling intervention increases consumer awareness of health and healthy choices at the point-of-purchase.Prev Med. 2013 Oct;57(4):253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Jul 13. Prev Med. 2013. PMID: 23859926 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of food nutrition labels on the health awareness of school-age children.BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 24;22(1):1249. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13613-y. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35751054 Free PMC article.
-
Using the theory of planned behavior to determine factors influencing processed foods consumption behavior.Nutr Res Pract. 2014 Jun;8(3):327-35. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2014.8.3.327. Epub 2014 May 15. Nutr Res Pract. 2014. PMID: 24944779 Free PMC article.
-
Nutrition labelling: a review of research on consumer and industry response in the global South.Glob Health Action. 2015 Jan 22;8:25912. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.25912. eCollection 2015. Glob Health Action. 2015. PMID: 25623608 Free PMC article.
-
The science on front-of-package food labels.Public Health Nutr. 2013 Mar;16(3):430-9. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012000754. Epub 2012 Mar 22. Public Health Nutr. 2013. PMID: 22440538 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Chang NS. Guidance daily amounts for sugar and sodium in foods for children. KFDA Report. 2007. [10/01/2009]. http://rnd.kfda.go.kr/index.jsp.
-
- Chung JY, Kim MJ. Using and understanding of nutrition labels and related factors among female adults in the Seoul area. Korean Journal of Community Nutrition. 2007;12:417–425.
-
- Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council on the provision of food information to consumers. Commission of the European Communities. 2008. [10/01/2009]. http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/labelingnutrition/foodlabeling/publication....
-
- CIAA labeling scheme. Confederation of the food and drink industries of the EU (Confédération des industries agro-alimentaires de l'UE) 2009. [10/01/2009]. http://www.active-lifestyle.eu/asp/our_actions/l2.asp?doc_id=29.
-
- Dotsch-Klerk M, Jensen L. The choice programme: a simple, front-of-pack stamp making healthy choices easy. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2008;17:383–386. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials