Male circumcision at different ages in Rwanda: a cost-effectiveness study
- PMID: 20098721
- PMCID: PMC2808207
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000211
Male circumcision at different ages in Rwanda: a cost-effectiveness study
Abstract
Background: There is strong evidence showing that male circumcision (MC) reduces HIV infection and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). In Rwanda, where adult HIV prevalence is 3%, MC is not a traditional practice. The Rwanda National AIDS Commission modelled cost and effects of MC at different ages to inform policy and programmatic decisions in relation to introducing MC. This study was necessary because the MC debate in Southern Africa has focused primarily on MC for adults. Further, this is the first time, to our knowledge, that a cost-effectiveness study on MC has been carried out in a country where HIV prevalence is below 5%.
Methods and findings: A cost-effectiveness model was developed and applied to three hypothetical cohorts in Rwanda: newborns, adolescents, and adult men. Effectiveness was defined as the number of HIV infections averted, and was calculated as the product of the number of people susceptible to HIV infection in the cohort, the HIV incidence rate at different ages, and the protective effect of MC; discounted back to the year of circumcision and summed over the life expectancy of the circumcised person. Direct costs were based on interviews with experienced health care providers to determine inputs involved in the procedure (from consumables to staff time) and related prices. Other costs included training, patient counselling, treatment of adverse events, and promotion campaigns, and they were adjusted for the averted lifetime cost of health care (antiretroviral therapy [ART], opportunistic infection [OI], laboratory tests). One-way sensitivity analysis was performed by varying the main inputs of the model, and thresholds were calculated at which each intervention is no longer cost-saving and at which an intervention costs more than one gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per life-year gained.
Results: Neonatal MC is less expensive than adolescent and adult MC (US$15 instead of US$59 per procedure) and is cost-saving (the cost-effectiveness ratio is negative), even though savings from infant circumcision will be realized later in time. The cost per infection averted is US$3,932 for adolescent MC and US$4,949 for adult MC. Results for infant MC appear robust. Infant MC remains highly cost-effective across a reasonable range of variation in the base case scenario. Adolescent MC is highly cost-effective for the base case scenario but this high cost-effectiveness is not robust to small changes in the input variables. Adult MC is neither cost-saving nor highly cost-effective when considering only the direct benefit for the circumcised man.
Conclusions: The study suggests that Rwanda should be simultaneously scaling up circumcision across a broad range of age groups, with high priority to the very young. Infant MC can be integrated into existing health services (i.e., neonatal visits and vaccination sessions) and over time has better potential than adolescent and adult circumcision to achieve the very high coverage of the population required for maximal reduction of HIV incidence. In the presence of infant MC, adolescent and adult MC would evolve into a "catch-up" campaign that would be needed at the start of the program but would eventually become superfluous. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
Conflict of interest statement
Agnes Binagwaho is an Editorial Board member of
Figures
Comment on
-
Neonatal circumcision for HIV prevention: Cost, culture, and behavioral considerations.PLoS Med. 2010 Jan 19;7(1):e1000219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000219. PLoS Med. 2010. PMID: 20098515 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Neonatal circumcision for HIV prevention: Cost, culture, and behavioral considerations.PLoS Med. 2010 Jan 19;7(1):e1000219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000219. PLoS Med. 2010. PMID: 20098515 Free PMC article.
-
Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention in Malawi: Modeling the Impact and Cost of Focusing the Program by Client Age and Geography.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0156521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156521. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27410474 Free PMC article.
-
Voluntary medical male circumcision: modeling the impact and cost of expanding male circumcision for HIV prevention in eastern and southern Africa.PLoS Med. 2011 Nov;8(11):e1001132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001132. Epub 2011 Nov 29. PLoS Med. 2011. PMID: 22140367 Free PMC article.
-
Where to deploy pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in sub-Saharan Africa?Sex Transm Infect. 2013 Dec;89(8):628-34. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2012-050891. Epub 2013 Aug 2. Sex Transm Infect. 2013. PMID: 23912819 Review.
-
Why Thailand should consider promoting neonatal circumcision?Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2012 Sep;43(5):1218-26. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2012. PMID: 23431830 Review.
Cited by
-
Factors Associated with Low Uptake of Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision as HIV-Prevention Strategy among Men Aged 18-49 Years from Nyanza District, Rwanda.HIV AIDS (Auckl). 2021 Apr 1;13:377-388. doi: 10.2147/HIV.S301045. eCollection 2021. HIV AIDS (Auckl). 2021. PMID: 33833586 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Cost of Early Infant Male Circumcision by Nurse-Midwives and Doctors in Zimbabwe.Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Jul 13;4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S68-75. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00201. Print 2016 Jul. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016. PMID: 27413085 Free PMC article.
-
Correlates of Condom Use and Procedure Knowledge Among Men Accessing Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision in Malawi.Int J Behav Med. 2017 Apr;24(2):305-311. doi: 10.1007/s12529-016-9594-3. Int J Behav Med. 2017. PMID: 27696216
-
Factors associated with acceptability of child circumcision in Botswana -- a cross sectional survey.BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):1053. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3722-5. BMC Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27716224 Free PMC article.
-
Africa 2010 in retrospect: hits and misses.Pan Afr Med J. 2010;7:22. Epub 2010 Dec 26. Pan Afr Med J. 2010. PMID: 21918709 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and World Health Organization (WHO) Male circumcision: global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability. Geneva: UNAIDS/WHO; 2007.
-
- Department of Statistics, in the Ministry of Economics (MINECOFIN) and MEASURE DHS. Interim Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey (2007–2008) Kigali, Rwanda: Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning;
-
- Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369:657–666. - PubMed
-
- Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369:643–656. - PubMed
-
- Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, et al. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical