Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;51(4):405-17.
doi: 10.1007/s10493-010-9337-0. Epub 2010 Jan 23.

Tick burden on European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)

Affiliations

Tick burden on European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)

Torsten Vor et al. Exp Appl Acarol. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

In our study we assessed the tick burden on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) in relation to age, physical condition, sex, deer density and season. The main objective was to find predictive parameters for tick burden. In September 2007, May, July, and September 2008, and in May and July 2009 we collected ticks on 142 culled roe deer from nine forest departments in Southern Hesse, Germany. To correlate tick burden and deer density we estimated deer density using line transect sampling that accounts for different detectability in March 2008 and 2009, respectively. We collected more than 8,600 ticks from roe deer heads and necks, 92.6% of which were Ixodes spp., 7.4% Dermacentor spp. Among Ixodes, 3.3% were larvae, 50.5% nymphs, 34.8% females and 11.4% males, with significant seasonal deviation. Total tick infestation was high, with considerable individual variation (from 0 to 270 ticks/deer). Adult tick burden was positively correlated with roe deer body indices (body mass, age, hind foot length). Significantly more nymphs were found on deer from forest departments with high roe deer density indices, indicating a positive correlation with deer abundance. Overall, tick burden was highly variable. Seasonality and large scale spatial characteristics appeared to be the most important factors affecting tick burden on roe deer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Location of the study sites in Southern Hesse, Germany
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Screened parts of roe deer (1 = head, 2 = neck). Drawing: W. Tambour
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Numbers of Ixodes (Ix) and Dermacentor (D) larvae, nymphs, females and males (a), and total Ixodes and Dermacentor numbers on roe deer heads vs. necks (b). Figures are given as means + standard errors; n = numbers of investigated roe deer
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Seasonal variation of tick burden on roe deer. Data are given as means with standard error, n May = 69, n July = 11, n September = 42

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC. The European roe deer: the biology of success. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press; 1998.
    1. Bruno P, Bruno G, Peréz-Eid C. Detection of spirochaetes of Borrelia burgdorferi complexe in the skin of cervids by PCR and culture. Eur J Epidemiol. 2000;16:869–873. doi: 10.1023/A:1007646216035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L. Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2001.
    1. Carpi G, Cagnacci F, Neteler M, Rizzoli A. Tick infestation on roe deer in relation to geographic and remotely sensed climatic variables in a tick-borne encephalitis endemic area. Epidemiol Infect. 2008;136:1416–1424. doi: 10.1017/S0950268807000039. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dautel H, Dippel C, Oehme R, Hartelt K, Schettler E. Evidence for an increased geographical distribution of Dermacentor reticulatus in Germany and detection of Rickettsia sp. RpA4. Int J Med Microbiol. 2006;296(Suppl. 1):149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2006.01.013. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources