Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jun;27(6):493-9.
doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247605. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

Neonatal outcomes and operative vaginal delivery versus cesarean delivery

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Neonatal outcomes and operative vaginal delivery versus cesarean delivery

Stephen A Contag et al. Am J Perinatol. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

We compared outcomes for neonates with forceps-assisted, vacuum-assisted, or cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor. This is a secondary analysis of a randomized trial in laboring, low-risk, nulliparous women at >or=36 weeks' gestation. Neonatal outcomes after use of forceps, vacuum, and cesarean were compared among women in the second stage of labor at station +1 or below (thirds scale) for failure of descent or nonreassuring fetal status. Nine hundred ninety women were included in this analysis: 549 (55%) with an indication for delivery of failure of descent and 441 (45%) for a nonreassuring fetal status. Umbilical cord gases were available for 87% of neonates. We found no differences in the base excess (P = 0.35 and 0.78 for failure of descent and nonreassuring fetal status) or frequencies of pH below 7.0 (P = 0.73 and 0.34 for failure of descent and nonreassuring fetal status) among the three delivery methods. Birth outcomes and umbilical cord blood gas values were similar for those neonates with a forceps-assisted, vacuum-assisted, or cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor. The occurrence of significant fetal acidemia was not different among the three delivery methods regardless of the indication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Menacker F National Center for Health Statistics .Trends in cesarean rates for first births and repeat cesarean rates for low-risk women: United States, 1990–2003 Hyattsville,MD:National vital statistics reports; vol54no4:2005 - PubMed
    1. National Center for Health Statistics .Martin JA ,Hamilton BE ,Sutton PD ,et al. Births: Final data for 2005 Hyattsville,MD:National vital statistics reports; vol56no6:2007 - PubMed
    1. Hannah ME ,Hannah WJ ,Hewson SA ,et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial. Lancet 2000;356:1375.– - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. VitalStats Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/vitalstats.htm Accessed 04–14-2009
    1. O’Leary CM ,de Klerk N ,Keogh J ,et al. Trends in mode of delivery during 1984–2003: can they be explained by pregnancy and delivery complications? BJOG 2007July;114(7):855.– - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding